Ray et al v. Bluehippo Funding, LLC et al

Filing 203

ORDER re Conference Call on September 30, 2008. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/30/2008. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. BLUEHIPPO FUNDING, LLC, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ROYLENE RAY, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C-06-1807 JSW (EMC) ORDER RE CONFERENCE CALL ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Court held a conference call on September 30, 2008, to address a discovery dispute between the parties regarding two requests for admission ("RFAs"). Plaintiffs' motion to compel with respect to RFA No. 16 is granted. The RFA has some relevance to class certification and does not impose an undue burden. The response to the RFA shall be served within twenty-five (25) days of the date of the conference call. Plaintiffs' motion to compel with respect to RFA No. 37 is denied. The RFA has at best marginal relevance to class certification, and the burden on BlueHippo to provide a response outweighs what limited probative value the discovery has.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 30, 2008 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States Magistrate Judge