Ray et al v. Bluehippo Funding, LLC et al

Filing 203

ORDER re Conference Call on September 30, 2008. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/30/2008. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. BLUEHIPPO FUNDING, LLC, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ROYLENE RAY, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C-06-1807 JSW (EMC) ORDER RE CONFERENCE CALL ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court held a conference call on September 30, 2008, to address a discovery dispute between the parties regarding two requests for admission ("RFAs"). Plaintiffs' motion to compel with respect to RFA No. 16 is granted. The RFA has some relevance to class certification and does not impose an undue burden. The response to the RFA shall be served within twenty-five (25) days of the date of the conference call. Plaintiffs' motion to compel with respect to RFA No. 37 is denied. The RFA has at best marginal relevance to class certification, and the burden on BlueHippo to provide a response outweighs what limited probative value the discovery has. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 30, 2008 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?