Garcia v. Yates

Filing 13

JUDGMENT: As to each of petitioners claims, the Court concludes the state courts determinations were neither contrary to, nor unreasonable applications of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent, nor were they based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED., ***Civil Case Terminated. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Deputy Clerk Dated: December 22, 2008 v. JAMES YATES, Warden, Respondent. / ARNULFO GARCIA, Petitioner, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. CV-06-1958 MMC (PR) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE () Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED As to each of petitioner's claims, the Court concludes the state court's determinations were neither contrary to, nor unreasonable applications of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent, nor were they based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Tracy Lucero

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?