Vinovation, Inc. et al v. VA Filtration USA LLC

Filing 92

ORDER GRANTING 91 Stipulation to Extend Conditional Dismissal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on March 23, 2010. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2010)

Download PDF
Case3:06-cv-02026-JSW Document91 Filed03/22/10 Page1 of 3 1 MICHAEL E. DERGOSITS (SBN 118206) TEDDY K. JOE (SBN 242589) 2 DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 3 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 705-6377 4 Facsimile: (415) 750-6383 Email: mdergosits@dergnoah.com 5 Email: tjoe@dergnoah.com 6 EDWARD W. GOLDSTEIN (pro hac vice) ALISA A. LIPSKI ( pro hac vice ) 7 JODY M. GOLDSTEIN ( pro hac vice ) GOLDSTEIN, FAUCETT & PREBEG L.L.P. 8 1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, TX 77027 9 Telephone: (713) 877-1515 Facsimile: (713) 877-1735 10 E-mail: egoldstein@gfpiplaw.com alipski@gfpiplaw.com 11 jgoldstein@gfpiplaw.com 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 VINOVATION, INC. and OENOVATION INTERNATIONAL LLC 14 15 16 17 18 R. DANNY HUNTINGTON (pro hac vice) BRIAN TOLLEFSON (pro hac vice) ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C. 1425 K Street, N.W. Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20005 Main No.: (202) 783-6040 Fax No.: (202) 783-6031 Email: dhuntington@rfem.com LAW OFFICE OF JUDITH S.H. HOM JUDITH S.H. HOM (SBN 203482) 236 West Portal Ave. #500 San Francisco, CA 94127 Telephone: (415) 845-6220 Facsimile: (415) 665-5933 Email: jshom@me.com Attorneys for Defendant VA FILTRATION USA LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No.: 3:06-cv-02026-JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL [F.R.C.P. 41(a)] Honorable Jeffrey S. White ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 23 VA FILTRATION USA LLC, a California ) ) corporation, ) 24 ) Defendant. 19 VINOVATION, INC., a California corporation and OENOVATION 20 INTERNATIONAL LLC, a California 21 corporation Plaintiffs, vs. 22 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 30-DAY EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Civil Action No.: 3:06-cv-02026-JSW 1 Case3:06-cv-02026-JSW Document91 Filed03/22/10 Page2 of 3 1 On February 18, 2010, the Court entered an Order (D.I. No. 91) for a voluntary 30-day 2 Conditional Dismissal with prejudice of the above entitled action, under Federal Rule of Civil 3 Procedure 41(a). The Order provided that Plaintiffs or Defendant could restore this matter to the 4 Court's active docket in the event that the parties fail to fully execute a written settlement 5 agreement within 30 days from the date of this Order. The parties are in agreement about the 6 terms of the settlement and have reduced the agreement to a writing ready to be signed by the 7 parties. However, the transaction contemplated by the settlement requires the consent of a third 8 party. The third party was requested to provide the necessary consent on March 19, 2010, once 9 the parties had finalized the language of the settlement agreement. In order to provide the third 10 party with a reasonable time to review and consent to the proposed transaction, the parties hereby 11 stipulate and request the Court to extend the February 18, 2010 Order (D.I. No. 91) for fifteen 12 (15) additional days. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 Dated: March 22, 2010 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: March 22, 2010 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 30-DAY EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Civil Action No.: 3:06-cv-02026-JSW 2 DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP By: /s/ Michael E. Dergosits Attorney for Plaintiffs VINOVATION, INC. and OENOVATION INTERNATIONAL LLC LAW OFFICE OF JUDITH S.H. HOM By: /s/ Judith Hom Attorney for Defendant VA FILTRATION USA LLC Case3:06-cv-02026-JSW Document91 Filed03/22/10 Page3 of 3 1 Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 March 23, 2010 4 Date:_______________________ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 30-DAY EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Civil Action No.: 3:06-cv-02026-JSW 3 __________________________________ THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?