Britt v. Kane et al

Filing 10

ORDER FOR BRIEFING ON MOTION TO EXPAND RECORD; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 10/1/2008. (Attachments: # 1 CertServ)(awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JACK DEWAYNE BRITT, Petitioner, v. A. P. KANE, Respondent. / No. C 06-2287 MHP (pr) ORDER FOR BRIEFING ON MOTION TO EXPAND RECORD Petitioner filed a document entitled "Judicial Notice, Motion For 1.94 Rule 7. Expansion of Record." He used the wrong case number on the motion, although it did reach the case file for this action. However, because petitioner used the wrong case number and sent the service copy addressed to the "State Attorney General," without specifying the individual Deputy Attorney General (i.e., Amber Wipfler) assigned to represent respondent in this action, it is unclear whether the service copy reached the right person. Accordingly, the court will have another copy sent to respondent's counsel and set a briefing schedule. The clerk will send a copy of the motion (docket # 9) to counsel for respondent. Respondent must file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to expand the record no later than October 24, 2008. Petitioner must file and serve a reply brief (if any) no later than November 10, 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 1, 2008 Marilyn Hall Patel United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?