Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 129

Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Doc. 129

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 129

Filed 01/10/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

2 DARLYN J. DUR - #169825
ASHOKRAMAN - #200020
3 710 Sansome Street

JEFFREY R. CHAN - #103649

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
4 Telephone: [phone]

Facsimile: [phone]
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 NETFLIX, INC.
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10

NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation,
11

Case No. C 062361 WHA (JCS)

Plaintiff,
12

v.
13

DECLARTION OF EUGENE PAIGE IN SUPPORT OF NETFLIX'S CLAIMCONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF
Date: Januar 31,2007

BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware
14 corporation, DOES 1-50,

Time: 1 :30 p.m.

Dept: Courroom 9, 19th Floor
15

Defendant.

Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup

16
17

18 AN RELATED COUNTERCLAIS
19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26 27
28

PAIGE DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF NETFLIX'S CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF CASE NO. C 06 2361 WH (JCS) Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 129

Filed 01/10/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 I, EUGENE M. PAIGE, declare and state as follows:

2

1.

I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before this Court, and am an associate

3 with Keker & VanNest, LLP, counsel to Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Netflix, Inc. I
4 have personal knowledge ofthe facts set forth below, and if called to testify as a witness thereto
5 could do so competently under oath.

6

2.

Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of pages 188-189 from the
Eric P. Meyer, taken September 22,2006.

7 transcript ofthe deposition of

8 I declare under penalty of peijur under the laws of the State of California that the
9 foregoing is tre and correct. Executed on this 10th day of Januar 2007, at San Francisco,

10
11

California.

12
13

Isl Eugene M. Paige

14
15

16
17
18

19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26
27 28
1

387753.01

PAIGE DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF NETFLIX'S CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WH (JCS)