Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Filing
140
ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST REGARDING COURTROOM EQUIPMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 29, 2007. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2007)
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Doc. 140
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 140 Document 139
Filed 01/29/2007 Filed 01/25/2007
Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 ASHOK RAMANI - #200020 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, NETFLIX, INC. ALSCHULER GROSSMAN LLP MARSHALL B. GROSSMAN - #35958 WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN - #99526 TONY D. CHEN - #176635 DOMINIQUE N. THOMAS - #231464 The Water Garden 1620 26th Street Fourth Floor, North Tower Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060 Telephone: 310-907-1000 Facsimile: 310-907-2000 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, BLOCKBUSTER INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, vs. BLOCKBUSTER INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-50, Defendants. CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS) JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COURTROOM EQUIPMENT FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING ON JANUARY 31, 2007 Hearing Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: Complaint Filed: January 31, 2007 1:30 P.M. 9, 19th Floor William H. Alsup April 4, 2006
AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION.
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURTROOM EQUIPMENT FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING ON 1/31/07 - C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 140 Document 139
Filed 01/29/2007 Filed 01/25/2007
Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, Netflix, Inc., and Defendant and Counterclaimant, Blockbuster Inc., hereby jointly request permission to bring into Courtroom 9 on January 31, 2007, the following equipment necessary for the Claim Construction Hearing in this case scheduled for 1:30 P.M. on that day: 1. By Netflix's counsel: a. Three laptop computers with optional computer mouse(s) and portable hard drive(s); b. c. One projection screen; and Various extension cord(s), audio and/or video cable(s), and power strip(s). 2. By Blockbuster's counsel: a. Two laptop computers with optional computer mouse(s) and portable hard drive(s); b. c. One digital projector; and Various extension cord(s), audio and/or video cable(s), power strip(s), and duct tape(s). Counsel for Netflix will make the projector screen available for shared use by counsel for Blockbuster, and counsel for Blockbuster will make the digital projector available for shared use by counsel for Netflix. The parties also request /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// ///
2
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURTROOM EQUIPMENT FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING ON 1/31/07 - C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 140 Document 139
Filed 01/29/2007 Filed 01/25/2007
Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
that, if counsel for either party becomes unable to bring one of these items, then counsel for the other party be authorized to bring such an item instead. Dated: January 25, 2007 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
By:
/S/ Ashok Ramani Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, NETFLIX, INC.
Dated: January 25, 2007
ALSCHULER GROSSMAN LLP
By:
/S/ Tony D. Chen Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, BLOCKBUSTER INC.
IT SO ORDERED.
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
F D IS T IC T O HONORABLE NWILLIAM H. ALSUP R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURTROOM EQUIPMENT FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING ON 1/31/07 - C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
A
January 29, 2007 Dated: ____________________
ER
C
LI
FO
Judge W
illiam A
lsup
R NIA
IT IS S
O ORD
ERED
RT U O
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?