Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 146

Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Doc. 146

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 146

Filed 02/12/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ALSCHULER GROSSMAN LLP

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN LLP Marshall B. Grossman (No. 35958) William J. O'Brien (No. 99526) Tony D. Chen (No. 176635) Dominique N. Thomas (No. 231464) The Water Garden 1620 26th Street Fourth Floor, North Tower Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 310-907-2000 Email: [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, Blockbuster Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, vs. BLOCKBUSTER INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-50, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION.

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DENNIS DILBECK'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED UNDER L.R. 3-12

Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup Complaint Filed: April 4, 2006

921515_1.DOC

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DENNIS DILBECK'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 146

Filed 02/12/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ALSCHULER GROSSMAN LLP

The Court having reviewed the papers filed in support of and in opposition to Dennis Dilbeck's Administrative Motion to consider whether Dennis Dilbeck v. Netflix, Inc., No. C 07-00643 PVT (N.D. Cal.) is related to Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster Inc., No. C 06 2361 WHA (N.D. Cal.) HEREBY ORDERS that the cases ARE NOT RELATED as defined in Civil L.R. 3-12(a).

Dated: ____________________ HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

921515_1.DOC

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DENNIS DILBECK'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION C 06 2361 WHA