Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Filing
160
Minute Entry: Discovery Hearing held on 3/9/2007 before Joseph C. Spero. Dft's shall report on the following: what was deleted, what can be recovered, the earliest possible time in which production can be made of recovered materials, earliest date on which materials from existing back-up tapes can be produced as it realtes to the Hollywood Act transaction. Continued hearing on Pla's Motion to Compel set for 3/13/7 at 1:30 p.m. (telephonic)(Court Reporter Belle Ball.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/12/2007)
<![CDATA[
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Doc. 160
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 160
Filed 03/12/2007
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES
CASE NO. C 06-02361 JCS CASE NAME: NETFLIX,INC. v. BLOCKBUSTER,INC. MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH C. SPERO DATE: March 9, 2007 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Eugene Paige (telephonic) Daralyn Duri (telephonic) TIME: 29 mins COURTROOM DEPUTY: Karen Hom COURT REPORTER: Belle Ball COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: William O'Brien (telephonic) Marshall Grossman (telephonic)
() Status Conf.
() P/T Conf.
() Discovery Conf.
() Further Case Mgmt. Conf.
OTHER PROCEEDINGS:
RULING:
1. Pla's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Blockbuster [Docket No. 157] ___________________________________________________________________________ ORDERED AFTER HEARING: Dft's shall report on the following: what was deleted, what can be recovered, the earliest possible time in which production can be made of recovered materials, earliest date on which materials from existing back-up tapes can be produced as it relates to the Hollywood Act transaction. ___________________________________________________________________________ ORDER TO BE PREPARED BY: CASE CONTINUED TO: Compel (telephonic)
cc: Chambers, Karen
() Plaintiff
() Defendant
() Court
03/13/7 at 1:30 PM for continued hearing on Pla's Motion to
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
