Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 162

Minute Entry: ContinuedDiscovery Hearing held on 3/13/2007 before Joseph C. Spero on Pla's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Blockbuster [Docket 157]. A telephonic status conference re: report on Kroll proces is specially set for 3/20/7 at 2:00 PM.(Court Reporter Kathy Wyatt.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/13/2007)

Download PDF
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc. 162 Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 162 Filed 03/13/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES CASE NO. C 06-02361 WHA (JCS) CASE NAME: NETFLIX,INC. v. BLOCKBUSTER,INC. MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH C. SPERO DATE: March 13, 2007 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Eugene Paige (telephonic) Daralyn Durie (telephonic) TIME: 31 mins COURTROOM DEPUTY: Karen Hom COURT REPORTER: Kathy Wyatt COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: William O'Brien (telephonic) () Status Conf. () P/T Conf. (X) Discovery Conf. () Further Case Mgmt. Conf. OTHER PROCEEDINGS: RULING: 1. Pla's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Blockbuster [Docket No. 157] ___________________________________________________________________________ ORDERED AFTER HEARING: All of the recovered e-mails for the period of time that were deleted during the pendency of this litigation until February 2007 shall be produced by 4/6/7. The production shall occur on a rolling basis. To the extend possible, e-mail production shall be prioritized so that the e-mails that contain the names of the witnesses who will be deposed this month and in April shall be produced first. ___________________________________________________________________________ ORDER TO BE PREPARED BY: () Plaintiff () Defendant () Court CASE CONTINUED TO: 03/20/07 at 2:00 PM, for a telephonic status conference re: report on Kroll progress (special setting). cc: Chambers, Karen Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?