Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 184

Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Doc. 184

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 184

Filed 04/16/2007

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. BLOCKBUSTER, INC., Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ On April 5, 2007, Plaintiff submitted a letter brief which the Court has construed as Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Unredacted Board Minutes [Docket No. 176] (the "Motion"). On April 6, 2007, the Court held telephonic hearing on the Motion. Daralyn Durie and Eugene Paige, counsel for Plaintiff, appeared. Marshall Grossman, counsel for Defendant, appeared. For the reasons stated on the record, and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT by April 16, 2007, Defendant shall submit, for in camera review, redacted and unredacted Board Minutes for final decision by the Court. The Court will issue a final ruling on the redaction before April 23, 2007. Defendant waived their right to appeal any decision on the propriety of those redactions. IT IS SO ORDERED. NETFLIX, INC., Plaintiff(s), Case No. C06-2361 WHA (JCS) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF UNREDACTED BOARD MINUTES [Docket No. 176] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: April 16, 2007

_______________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge

Dockets.Justia.com