Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Filing
204
RESPONSE to NETFLIX'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER by Netflix, Inc.. (Paige, Eugene) (Filed on 5/7/2007)
<![CDATA[
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Doc. 204
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 204
Filed 05/07/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 ASHOK RAMANI - #200020 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Plaintiff NETFLIX, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-50, Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
Case No. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS) NETFLIX'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER Complaint filed: April 4, 2006
394919.01
NETFLIX'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 204
Filed 05/07/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Netflix respectfully submits this response to the Court's May 1, 2007 Order requesting input on page limits for summary judgment motions: Netflix has no objection to the proposed limitations set forth in the Court's May 1, 2007 Order.
Dated: May 7, 2007
Respectfully submitted, KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
By: _____/s/ Eugene M. Paige___________ Eugene M. Paige Attorneys for Plaintiff NETFLIX, INC.
1
394919.01
NETFLIX'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
