Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 204

RESPONSE to NETFLIX'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER by Netflix, Inc.. (Paige, Eugene) (Filed on 5/7/2007)

Download PDF
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc. 204 Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 204 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 ASHOK RAMANI - #200020 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Plaintiff NETFLIX, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-50, Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS Case No. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS) NETFLIX'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER Complaint filed: April 4, 2006 394919.01 NETFLIX'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS) Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 204 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Netflix respectfully submits this response to the Court's May 1, 2007 Order requesting input on page limits for summary judgment motions: Netflix has no objection to the proposed limitations set forth in the Court's May 1, 2007 Order. Dated: May 7, 2007 Respectfully submitted, KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP By: _____/s/ Eugene M. Paige___________ Eugene M. Paige Attorneys for Plaintiff NETFLIX, INC. 1 394919.01 NETFLIX'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?