Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 232

Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Doc. 232

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 232

Filed 06/15/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP Donn P. Pickett (SBN 72257) [e-mail] Mary T. Huser (SBN 136051) [e-mail] Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Marshall B. Grossman (SBN 35958) [e-mail] William J. O'Brien (SBN 99526) [e-mail] The Water Garden 1620 26th Street Fourth Floor, North Tower Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, BLOCKBUSTER INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NETFLIX, INC, a Delaware corporation v. Plaintiff,

Case No. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS) NOTICE OF ERRATA TO NOTICE OF MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF BLOCKBUSTER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY AND NONINFRINGEMENT Hearing Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: Complaint Filed: Trial Date: August 2, 2007 8:00 a.m. 9, 19th Floor Hon. William H. Alsup April 4, 2006 September 17, 2007

BLOCKBUSTER INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-50, Defendant.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

ACTIVE/72054158.1/3312460-3300206704

1

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)

NOTICE OF ERRATA TO NOTICE OF MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF BLOCKBUSTER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY AND NON-INFRINGEMENT

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 232

Filed 06/15/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Blockbuster inadvertently included an error in its Motion for Summary Judgment filed June 14, 2007. Page 28 at lines 9-10 of the Motion states: "All asserted claims of the `450 patent require that items be provided "in the desired order" or "based upon the desired order." It should read: Asserted claims 5 and 20 of the `450 patent require that items be provided "based upon the desired order." This error was not noticed until after the Motion had been e-filed. Additionally, the `450 and `381 patents are attached as Exhibits A and B respectively to the Confidential Declaration of William O'Brien, and first cited to on page six of the Motion. Certificates of correction were filed for the '450 patent, but because they did not alter the arguments in the motion, those pages were not attached to the exhibit in consideration of the Court's strict page limit requirements. Copies of the certificates of correction appear at the end of Exhibit B to the First Amended Complaint. Dated: June 15, 2007 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

By:________________/s/_______ Sheila M. Pierce Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, BLOCKBUSTER INC.

ACTIVE/72054158.1/3312460-3300206704

2

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)

NOTICE OF ERRATA TO NOTICE OF MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF BLOCKBUSTER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY AND NON-INFRINGEMENT