Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 240

ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 26, 2007. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2007)

Download PDF
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc. 240 Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 240 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. BLOCKBUSTER,INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. / ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE No. C 06-02361 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has signed a modified stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. The Court will not acquiesce in the proviso that the Court should retain jurisdiction because the parties did not supply a copy of the settlement agreement to the Court and it has no way of forecasting the difficulties counsel have in mind. Even if the settlement agreement were provided, the Court might or might not be willing to be a future referee for disputes arising out of the settlement agreement. Finally, in light of the parallel consumer class action, the Court's signing of this order should not be construed as judicial approval of the settlement agreement; rather, this order simply dismisses the action with prejudice at the request of the immediate parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 26, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?