Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 4

Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Doc. 4

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 4

Filed 04/28/2006

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 ASIM M. BHANSALI - #194925 KEVIN T. REED - #240799 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff NETFLIX, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-50, Defendant. Case No. C 06 2361 BZ DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge.

Dated: April 28, 2006

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By: /s/ Daralyn J. Durie JEFFREY R. CHANIN DARALYN J. DURIE Attorneys for Plaintiff NETFLIX, INC.

370837.01

DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CASE NO. C 06 2361 BZ
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 4

Filed 04/28/2006

Page 2 of 2

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2
3

4
5

I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, State of Californa in the office of a member of the bar of this cour at whose direction the following service was made. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a pary to the within action. My business address is Keker & Van Nest, LLP, 710 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111.
On April

28, 2006, I served the following document(s):

6
7

DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
by regular UNITED STATES MAIL by placing a tre and correct copy in a sealed envelope addressed as shown below. I am readily familiar with the practice of Keker & Van Nest, LLP for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. According to that practice, items are deposited with the United States Postal Service at San Francisco, Californa on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of the part served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or the postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing stated in this affdavit.

80
9

10
11

12
13

14
15

Marshall B. Grossman, Esq. Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan LLP 1620 26th Street, 4th Floor, North Tower Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060

Executed on April 28, 2006, at San Francisco, Californa.
16
I declare under penalty ofpeijury under the laws of the State of

California that the above is tre

17
18

and correct.

19

~l- ~~kSHELBY L. OCK

20
21

22
23

24
25

26
27 28

372095.01

PROOF OF SERVICE
NETFLIX V. BLOCKBUSTER, USDC CASE NO. C 06 2361 BZ