Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Filing
60
STIPULATION re
58 MOTION to Intervene
Stipulation Continuing Hearing & [Proposed] Order by Netflix, Inc.. (Ramani, Ashok) (Filed on 10/20/2006)
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Doc. 60
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 60
Filed 10/20/2006
Page 1 of 3
2 DARLYN J. DURll - #169825
ASHOK RAANI - #200020
3 71 0 Sansome Street
1 KEKER & V AN NEST, LLP JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
4 Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 NETFLIX, INC.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation,
11
Case No. C 06 2361 WHA
Plaintiff,
12
STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING & (PROPOSED) ORDER
v.
13
BLOCKBUSTER, INC.,
a Delaware
Defendant.
14 corporation, DOES 1-50,
15
Complaint fied: April 4, 2006 Date: TBD Time: TBD Dept: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup
16
AN RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
17
18
19.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
382687.01
STIPULATION CONTINING HEARIG & (PROPOSED) ORDER CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 60
Filed 10/20/2006
Page 2 of 3
1 WHEREAS, on October 11,2006, proposed intervenor Dennis Dilbeck ("Dilbeck") filed
2 a motion requesting to intervene in this case, with a hearing date set for November 16,2006;
3 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Netflix, Inc. ("Netfix") and defendant
4 and counterclaimant Blockbuster Inc. ("Blockbuster") were not aware of
Dilbeck's request to
5 intervene until they received his motion through the Court's Electronic Case Filing system;
6 WHEREAS, the parties therefore have been permitted only two weeks to consider their
7 position on the proposed intervention and submit briefing on their position, and additional time
8 to consider and brief
the issues presented by Dilbeck's request for inteiyention would be helpful
9 to the parties and wil enhance their ability to assist the Court in reaching a decision on the
10 motion through their briefing;
11 WHEREAS, counsel for Dilbeck Scott Kamber has stated to Netfix's counsel Ashok
12 Ramani and Blockbuster's counsel Willam O'Brien today that he does not oppose this request
13 for continuance of the hearing;
14 WHEREAS, no changes in the schedule of this case would be necessitated by continuing
15 this hearing;
16 WHEREAS, the only previous modifications of time in this case were to allow
17 Blockbuster additional time to respond to Netfix's complaint;
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
382687.01
STIPULATION CONTINING HEARING & (PROPOSED) ORDER CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 60
Filed 10/20/2006
Page 3 of 3
1 THEREFORE, Netflx and Blockbuster respectfully request that this Court enter an order
2 continuing the date for the hearing on Dilbeck's motion until November 30,2006 at 8 a.m., and
3 with the briefing schedule being adjusted accordingly under the Local Rules.
4
5
Dated: October 19, 2006
Respectfully submitted,
6
7
8
KEKER & V AN NEST, LLP
By: Isl Ashok Ramani Attorneys For Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant NETFLIX, INC.
9
10
11
Dated: October 19, 2006
Respectfully submitted,
ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN
LLP
12
13
By: ();//ìa,l¡ 0 8rieyl ~
Attorneys For Defendant and
Counterclaimant BLOCKBUSTER INC.
14
15
16 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18 Dated:
19
20
21
By:
THE HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
382687.01
STIPULATION CONTINING HEARING & (PROPOSED) ORDER CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?