Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 77

STIPULATION re 69 Declaration in Support,,, 70 Proposed Order,, Stipulation Requesting Withdrawal of Docket Entries #68, 69 and 70 by Netflix, Inc.. (Ramani, Ashok) (Filed on 11/3/2006)

Download PDF
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc. 77 Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 77 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JEFFREYR. CHANIN - #103649 2 3 DARL YN J. DUR - #169825 ASHOK RAANI - #200020 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 4 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 5 Email: jrc~kvn.com djd~kvn.com axr~kvn.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant, 6 7 NETFLIX, INC. 8 ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAAN LLP Marshall B. Grossman (No. 35958) 9 Wiliam J. O'Brien (No. 99526) Tony D. Chen (No. 176635) 10 DominiqueN. Thomas (No. 231464) 11 1620 26th Street The Water Garden Fourth Floor, North Tower 12 Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060 Telephone: 310-907-1000 13 Facsimile: 310-907-2000 Email: mgrossman~agsk.com 14 wobrien~agsk.com tchen~agsk.com 15 dthomas~agsk.com Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 16 Blockbuster Inc. 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. 19 20 Case No. C 06 2361 WHA 21 22 23 STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70 24 25 BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-50, Defendant. Complaint filed: April 4, 2006 26 27 ?R AN RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 383764.01 STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70 CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 77 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 WHEREAS, on Friday, November 3, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant Netflix, Inc. 2 inadvertently filed Docket Entries #68 (entitled "PlaintiffNetflx, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and 3 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion to Compel Production of Eugene M. Paige in Support 4 Documents from Blockbuster, Inc."), #69 (entitled "Declaration of 5 ofNetflix's Motion to Compel"), and #70 ("(Proposed) Order on Netflx's Motion to Compel the 6 Production of Documents from Blockbuster, Inc."); Docket Entry #68, as opposed to the final version, was 7 WHEREAS, a draft of 8 inadvertentlye-filed; 9 WHEREAS, Docket Entries #69 and 70 relate to Docket Entry #68, and thus improperly 10 relate to a document fied in error; 11 WHEREAS, Netfix wil today fie the final version of Docket Entry #68 and re-fie 12 Docket Entries #69 and #70 to relate to that final version; 13 THEREFORE, both Netflx and Blockbuster hereby request that Docket Entres #68,69, 14 15 and 70 be withdrawn. Dated: November 3,2006 Respectfully submitted, 16 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 17 18 19 By: Isl Ashok Ramani Attorneys For Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant NETFLIX, INc. 20 21 Dated: November 3,2006 Respectfully submitted, ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN 22 23 LLP 24 25 26 By: ti i II" q WI () '/3ėlVl,hr g Attorneys For Defendant and Counterclaimant BLOCKBUSTER INC. 27 ?R 1 383764.01 STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70 CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 77 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 Pursuant to stipulation, IT is SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: 3 4 By: 5 6 7 8 THE HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ?R 2 383764.01 STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70 CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?