Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 86

Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Doc. 86

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 86

Filed 11/06/2006

Page 1 of 3

1

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JEFFREYR. CHANIN - #103649

2
3

DARL YN J. DUR - #169825 ASHOK RAANI - #200020
710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: [phone]

4 Facsimile: [phone]
5

Email: jrc~kvn.com djd~kvn.com axr~kvn.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant,

6

7 NETFLIX, INC.

8 ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAAN LLP Marshall B. Grossman (No. 35958) 9 Wiliam J. O'Brien (No. 99526)
Tony D. Chen (No. 176635)

10 DominiqueN. Thomas (No. 231464)

11 1620 26th Street

The Water Garden

Fourth Floor, North Tower
12 Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 310-907-2000

Email: mgrossman~agsk.com
14 wobrien~agsk.com

tchen~agsk.com
15 dthomas~agsk.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 16 Blockbuster Inc.
17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.

19

20

Case No. C 06 2361 WHA

21

22
23

STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES
#68, 69, AND 70

24
25

BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-50,
Defendant.

Complaint filed: April 4, 2006

26 27
?R

AN RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

383764.01

STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70 CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 86

Filed 11/06/2006

Page 2 of 3

1 WHEREAS, on Friday, November 3, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant Netflix, Inc.
2 inadvertently filed Docket Entries #68 (entitled "PlaintiffNetflx, Inc.'s Notice of

Motion and

3 Memorandum of

Points and Authorities in Support of

its Motion to Compel Production of
Eugene M. Paige in Support

4 Documents from Blockbuster,

Inc."), #69 (entitled "Declaration of

5 ofNetflix's Motion to Compel"), and #70 ("(Proposed) Order on Netflx's Motion to Compel the
6 Production of

Documents from Blockbuster, Inc."); Docket Entry #68, as opposed to the final version, was

7 WHEREAS, a draft of

8 inadvertentlye-filed;
9 WHEREAS, Docket Entries #69 and 70 relate to Docket Entry #68, and thus improperly
10 relate to a document fied in error;
11 WHEREAS, Netfix wil today fie the final version of

Docket Entry #68 and re-fie

12 Docket Entries #69 and #70 to relate to that final version;

13 THEREFORE, both Netflx and Blockbuster hereby request that Docket Entres #68,69,
14
15

and 70 be withdrawn.
Dated: November 3,2006
Respectfully submitted,

16
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

17
18

19

By: Isl Ashok Ramani Attorneys For Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant NETFLIX, INc.

20
21

Dated: November 3,2006

Respectfully submitted,

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN

22
23

LLP

24
25 26

By: ti i II" q WI () '/3ėlVl,hr g
Attorneys For Defendant and
Counterclaimant BLOCKBUSTER INC.

27
?R
1

383764.01

STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70 CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA

Document 86

Filed 11/06/2006

Page 3 of 3

1 Pursuant to stipulation, IT is SO ORDERED.

2
3

By:
5

7
8

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

9

10
11

12
13

14
15

16 17
18

19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26 27
?R

2
383764.01

STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70 CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA

A

C

LI

6

FO

THE HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO . Spero UNITED STATESseph C Judge Jo MAGISTRATE JUGE
NO

R NIA

4

UNIT ED

Dated: November 6, 2006

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

RT

H