Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Filing
88
Minute Entry: Lead trial counsel, in person, meet and confer re:Discovery Motions held on 11/15/2006 before Joseph C. Spero. Parties shall submit two stipulations: 1) a scheduling stip by 11/20/6 and 2) a substantive stip as to the agreed upon matters and any unresolved issues. The current hearing date of 12/8/6 at 9:30 a.m., on the pending discovery motions has been taken off calendar. (Tape #Not recorded.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 11/15/2006)
<![CDATA[
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Doc. 88
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 88
Filed 11/15/2006
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTE ORDER
CASE NO.: C06-2361 WHA (JCS) CASE NAME: Netflix v. Blockbuster MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH C. SPERO DATE: November 15, 2006 TIME: 3.5 hrs COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Jeff Chanin and Eugene Paige COURTROOM DEPUTY: Karen Hom COURT REPORTER: Not recorded COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: Marshall Grossman & William O'Brien
PROCEEDINGS
9 X 9 9 9
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
9
FURTHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
DISCOVERY CONFERENCE: Lead trial counsel, in person, meet and confer re: Discovery Motions. STATUS CONFERENCE RE: TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE RE: OTHER: FOR
CASE CONTINUED TO: NOTES:
Parties shall submit two stipulations: 1) a scheduling stipulation by Monday, 11/20/6, and 2) a substantive stipulation as to the agreed upon matters and any unresolved issues. The current hearing date of Dec. 8, 2006 at 9:30 a.m., on the pending discovery motions has been taken off calendar.
cc:
Chambers
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
