Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 92

STIPULATION AND {PROPOSED] ORDER RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS by Blockbuster, Inc.(a Delaware corporation), Blockbuster, Inc.(a Delaware corporation), Blockbuster, Inc.. (Ramani, Ashok) (Filed on 11/20/2006)

Download PDF
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc. 92 Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 92 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP Jeffrey R. Chanin (No. 103649) Daralyn J. Durie (No. 169825) Ashok Ramani (Ng. 200020) Eugene M. Paige (No. 202849) 710 Sansome Street San Francisco; CA 94111-5400 Facsimile: 1415) 397-7188 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 6 Email: jrc(kv.com adune(fkv.com axr(ikVn.com 7 8 emp~kv.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, Netflix, Inc. 9 10 11 ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP Marshall B. Grossman (No. 35958) William J. O'Brien (No. 99526) Tony D. Chen (No. 176635) Dominique N. thomas (No. 231464) 12 13 The Water Garden 1620 26th Street Fourth Floor, North Tower Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060 Telephone: 310-907-1000 14 15 Facsimile: 310-907-2000 EmaIl: mgrossman(iagskcom wobrien(fagskcom tchen(fa&s:K.com 16 17 18 dthomas~agskcom Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, Blockbuster Inc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. C 062361 WHA (JCS) Referred To The Hon. Joseph C. Spero For Discovery Matters 22 23 24 25 BLOCKBUSTER INC. a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-5 , 26 27 28 Defendants. STIPULATION AND rPROPOSEDl ORDER RE FURTHER PllOCEEDINGS ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION STIPULATION RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS C 06 236 i WHA (JCS) Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 92 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, Netflix, Inc., and Defendant and 2 Counterclaimant, Blockbuster Inc. (collectively, "the Parties"), jointly submit this 3 stipulation pursuant to the Court's Order of November 15,2006, with respect to 4 further proceedings on Blockbuster's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Its 5 First Set of Requests for Production, Netflix's Motion to Compel Further Requests for Production, and Netflix's Motion for a which were previously scheduled 6 Responses to its First Set of 7 Protective Order Re Non-Part Subpoenas, all of 8 for hearing on December 8, 2006 (collectively, the "Pending Discovery Motions"). 9 Unless the paries have resolved all outstanding issues on the Pending 10 Discovery Motions before December 8, 2006, the respective lead tral counsel for 11 the Parties shall hold a further in-person conference on those motions on December 12 8,2006, beginning at 9:00 a.m. in the Honorable Joseph C. Spero's courtoom. 13 The Parties shall file a stipulation with the Cour detailing the orders that they 14 agree the Cour should enter on the Pending Discovery Motions, along with a 15 description of whatever issues remain for decision by the court on those motions, 16 no later than Thursday, December 14,2006. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS 2 ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS C 06 2361 WHA (JCS) Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 92 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 The Parties respectfully request that the Court schedule a hearing on any 2 issues that remain, as set forth in that stipulation, on Friday, January 12,2007, at 3 9:00 a.m. 4 5 Respectfully submitted. 6 7 DATED: November 20,2006 8 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 9 By Isl 10 11 Ashok Ramani Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, Netflix, Iric. 12 DATED: November 20,2006 13 ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAAN LLP 14 15 By tVI//qHt J: O'8lteY1/ IPf ~ William J. O'Brien ( Blockbuster Inc. 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS C 06 2361 WHA (JCS) STIPULATION RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?