Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Filing
92
STIPULATION AND {PROPOSED] ORDER RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS by Blockbuster, Inc.(a Delaware corporation), Blockbuster, Inc.(a Delaware corporation), Blockbuster, Inc.. (Ramani, Ashok) (Filed on 11/20/2006)
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Doc. 92
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 92
Filed 11/20/2006
Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP Jeffrey R. Chanin (No. 103649) Daralyn J. Durie (No. 169825) Ashok Ramani (Ng. 200020) Eugene M. Paige (No. 202849) 710 Sansome Street San Francisco; CA 94111-5400
Facsimile: 1415) 397-7188
Telephone: (415) 391-5400
6
Email: jrc(£kv.com adune(fkv.com
axr(ikVn.com
7
8
emp~kv.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
Netflix, Inc.
9
10
11
ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP Marshall B. Grossman (No. 35958) William J. O'Brien (No. 99526) Tony D. Chen (No. 176635)
Dominique N. thomas (No. 231464)
12
13
The Water Garden 1620 26th Street Fourth Floor, North Tower Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060
Telephone: 310-907-1000
14
15
Facsimile: 310-907-2000 EmaIl: mgrossman(iagskcom wobrien(fagskcom
tchen(fa&s:K.com
16 17
18
dthomas~agskcom
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,
Blockbuster Inc.
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CASE NO. C 062361 WHA (JCS)
Referred To The Hon. Joseph C. Spero For Discovery Matters
22
23
24
25
BLOCKBUSTER INC.Ó a Delaware corporation, DOES 1-5 ,
26
27
28
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND rPROPOSEDl ORDER RE FURTHER PllOCEEDINGS ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS
AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION
STIPULATION RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS C 06 236 i WHA (JCS)
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 92
Filed 11/20/2006
Page 2 of 3
1 Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, Netflix, Inc., and Defendant and
2 Counterclaimant, Blockbuster Inc. (collectively, "the Parties"), jointly submit this
3 stipulation pursuant to the Court's Order of
November 15,2006, with respect to
4 further proceedings on Blockbuster's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Its
5 First Set of
Requests for Production, Netflix's Motion to Compel Further
Requests for Production, and Netflix's Motion for a
which were previously scheduled
6 Responses to its First Set of
7 Protective Order Re Non-Part Subpoenas, all of
8 for hearing on December 8, 2006 (collectively, the "Pending Discovery Motions").
9 Unless the paries have resolved all outstanding issues on the Pending
10 Discovery Motions before December 8, 2006, the respective lead tral counsel for
11 the Parties shall hold a further in-person conference on those motions on December
12 8,2006, beginning at 9:00 a.m. in the Honorable Joseph C. Spero's courtoom.
13 The Parties shall file a stipulation with the Cour detailing the orders that they
14 agree the Cour should enter on the Pending Discovery Motions, along with a
15 description of whatever issues remain for decision by the court on those motions,
16 no later than Thursday, December 14,2006.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 27 28
STIPULATION RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
2 ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS
C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
Document 92
Filed 11/20/2006
Page 3 of 3
1 The Parties respectfully request that the Court schedule a hearing on any
2 issues that remain, as set forth in that stipulation, on Friday, January 12,2007, at
3 9:00 a.m.
4
5 Respectfully submitted.
6
7 DATED: November 20,2006
8
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
9
By Isl
10
11
Ashok Ramani Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, Netflix, Iric.
12 DATED: November 20,2006
13
ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAAN LLP
14
15
By tV¡I//qHt J: O'8lteY1/ IPf ~
William J. O'Brien (
Blockbuster Inc.
16 17
18 19
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 27
28
3 ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS
C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
STIPULATION RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?