Humboldt Baykeeper et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Filing
316
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White denying 281 Motion to Dismiss (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HUMBOLDT BAYKEEPER and ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY, Defendants. /
No. C 06-02560 JSW
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
Now before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party. On June 1, 2009, this Court issued an Order denying Defendants' motion for leave to amend their answer. The Court found that the State was at most a necessary party to this action, but would not be indispensable because, pursuant to the Ex parte Young doctrine, the State may be sued for violations of federal law in which the plaintiffs merely seek prospective, injunctive relief. Moreover, the Court found that Defendants waived the defense of failure to join a necessary party. Based on this ruling, Defendants have indicated that although they are not willing to withdraw their motion to dismiss, they do not intend to file any further briefs in support of their motion. Accordingly, this motion is now fully briefed and ripe for decision. The Court finds that this matter is appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the hearing set for July 17, 2009 on Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party is
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
VACATED. The Court further finds that based upon the reasoning set forth in the Order denying Defendants' motion for leave to amend their answer, the Court DENIES Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 19, 2009
JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?