Humboldt Baykeeper et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Filing 373

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on February 5, 2010. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HUMBOLDT BAYKEEPER and ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY, Defendants. /

No. C 06-02560 JSW

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1

Although the Court does not ordinarily provide parties an opportunity to submit a reply brief in support of motions in limine, Defendants assert defenses that their failure to disclose witnesses and documents was either substantially justified or that Plaintiffs have not suffered any prejudice. The Court directs Plaintiffs to file a reply brief to address these defenses by no later than 10:00 a.m. on February 11, 2010. In particular, Plaintiffs shall identify which specific documents or witnesses about which they contend Defendants' untimely disclosure was not substantially justified and Plaintiffs would suffer prejudice if not excluded. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2010

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE