Humboldt Baykeeper et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Filing 487

ORDER Regarding Case Status. Signed by Judge Jeffery S. White on September 9, 2010. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2010)

Download PDF
Humboldt Baykeeper et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al Doc. 487 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HUMBOLDT BAYKEEPER and ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al., Defendants. / No. C 06-02560 JSW United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING CASE STATUS All parties, with the exception of NCRA, have settled this matter on the record. Plaintiffs have agreed to dismiss NCRA with prejudice. The Court HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiffs shall file a noticed motion seeking leave to dismiss NCRA or a stipulation of dismissal by no later than September 15, 2010. If Plaintiffs fail to file a motion or stipulation of dismissal by this date, or if the settled parties fail to finalize the settlement and dismiss the other defendants, the Court will reset the trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 9, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?