Augillard et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER granting motion to withdraw as counsel and dismissing case with prejudice (Augillard, 06-2675). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/3/2009. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND 12 PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. MDL 05-01699 CRB ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND DISMISSING CLAIMS / This document relates to: JOHN AUGILLARD, 06-2675 CRB ___________________________________/ By Order filed March 4, 2009, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause by March 27, 2009 as to why (1) counsel's motion to withdraw should not be granted; and (2) plaintiff's lawsuit should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. As of the date of this Order, plaintiff has not responded to the Order To Show Cause and has not otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the claims of John Augillard are dismissed with prejudice for a failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 3, 2009 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\dismissalorders\Auguillarddismissal.wpd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\dismissalorders\Auguilla2ddismissal.wpd r

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?