Minority Television Project Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 70 Stipulation filed by Minority Television Project Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on April 24, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 JOHN L. FITZGERALD (SBN 126613) ANDREW A. AUGUST (SBN 112851) PINNACLE LAW GROUP LLP 425 California Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 394-5700 Facsimile: (415) 394-5003 aaugust@pinnaclelawgroup.com WALTER E. DIERCKS (pro hac vice) RUBIN, WINSTON, DIERCKS, HARRIS & COOKE, LLP Sixth Floor, 1155 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 861-0870 Facsimile: (202) 429-0657 wdiercks@rwdhc.com Attorneys for Plaintiff MINORITY TELEVISION PROJECT, INC. JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (SBN 44332) United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (SBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division MELISSA K. BROWN (SBN 203307) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-6962 Facsimile: (415) 436-6748 Attorneys for Defendants FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MINORITY TELEVISION PROJECT, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 06-2699-EDL 22 v. 23 24 25 Defendants. 26 27 PINNACLE LAW GROUP LLP FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE 425 CALIFORNIA STREET SUITE 1800 28 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 (415) 394-5700 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Modify Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule Case No. C 06-2699 EDL 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS, the plaintiff, Minority Television Project, Inc. ("Plaintiff") requests a modification to Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule issued by this Court on February 4, 2009, due to medical issues encountered by lead counsel, Walter E. Diercks, and his wife; WHEREAS, as a result of these issues, the parties United States of America and the 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 · 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Modify Dispositive 2 Motion Briefing Schedule Federal Communications Commission (collectively "Defendants") and Plaintiff have agreed to the proposed modification to the Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule: Dispositive Motions · · · Plaintiff's Opening and/or cross motion shall be due on May 5, 2009; Defendants' Reply Brief shall be due on May 27, 2009; Plaintiff's Reply Brief shall be due on June 9, 2009; Dispositive Motion hearing shall be held on June 30, 2009 at 9:00 am WHEREAS the parties respectfully request that the Court adopt the proposed aforementioned modification to the Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule. Dated: April 24, 2009 Respectfully submitted, Andrew A. August John L. Fitzgerald Walter E. Diercks By: /s/ Andrew A. August Attorneys for MINORITY TELEVISION PROJECT, INC. Dated: April 24, 2009 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney By: /s/ Melissa K. Brown Melissa K. Brown Assistant United States Attorney 1 2 3 4 · 5 6 7 8 9 10 · · · Dispositive Motions [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff's Opening and/or cross motion shall be due on May 5, 2009; Defendants' Reply Brief shall be due on May 27, 2009; Plaintiff's Reply Brief shall be due on June 9, 2009; The Dispositive Motion hearing shall be held on June 30, 2009 at 9:00 am. IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER N F D IS T IC T O R Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Modify Dispositive 3 Motion Briefing Schedule A C LI FO 13 Judge E lizabeth D. Lapo rte R NIA 12 UNIT ED 11 RT U O April 24, 2009 Dated: _________________ ______________________________ ED ELIZAIBETO ORDERAPORTE T IS SH D. L United States Magistrate Judge NO S RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?