Tucker v. Department of Corrections et al

Filing 41

ORDER. In the interest of justice, the court requests that CDCR permit plaintiff to secure a declaration from each of the two prisoners who plaintiff contends witnessed the incident at issue and directs the state attorney general's office facili tate the process. The declarations should be signed under penalty of perjury and filed with plaintiff's opposition to the remaining defendant's motion for summary judgment.. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 11/25/2008. (Attachments: # 1 proof of service)(cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\VRW\CR.06\Tucker2.or5.wpd IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES NATHANIEL TUCKER, Plaintiff(s), v. EDWARD S ALAMEIDA, JR, et al, Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No C 06-2727 VRW (PR) ORDER Plaintiff requests the court's assistance in securing a declaration or live testimony from two prisoner witnesses to the incident at issue in this excessive force case. He notes that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) generally prohibits correspondence between inmates. In the interest of justice, the court requests that CDCR permit plaintiff to secure a declaration from each of the two prisoners who plaintiff contends witnessed the incident at issue and directs the state attorney general's office facilitate the process. The declarations should be signed under penalty of perjury and filed with plaintiff's opposition to the remaining defendant's motion for summary judgment. SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?