Hiken et al v. Department of Defense et al
Filing
122
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 115 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on July 3, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NO. C 06-02812 JW
Marguerite Hiken, et al.,
11
ORDER VACATING HEARING
Plaintiffs,
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Department of Defense, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
/
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees.1 The Motion is scheduled
16
for a hearing on July 9, 2012. Upon review, however, the Court finds that it is appropriate to take
17
the Motion under submission without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b).
18
Accordingly, the Court VACATES the July 9 hearing on the Motion.
19
20
21
Dated: July 3, 2012
JAMES WARE
United States District Chief Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
(Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and Motion for an Attorney Fee Award Per 5 U.S.C. §
552(a)(4)(E); Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, hereafter, “Motion,”
Docket Item No. 115.)
1
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:
2
Colleen Flynn colleen_ucsc@hotmail.com
Timothy Andrew Johnson timothy.johnson4@usdoj.gov
W. Gordon Kaupp gordonk@hotmail.com
3
4
Dated: July 3, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By:
/s/ JW Chambers
William Noble
Courtroom Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?