Chevron Global Technology Services Company et al v. Little

Filing 74

ORDER EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES. The last day for the parties to file and serve cross-motions for summary judgment is extended to February 12, 2010, the last day to file oppositions is extended to February 26, 2010, the last day to file replies is extended to March 5, 2010, and the hearing is extended to March 26, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 8, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2010)

Download PDF
1 Michele Ballard Miller (SBN 104198) mbm@millerlawgroup.com 2 Katherine L. Kettler (SBN 231586) klk@millerlawgroup.com 3 MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 4 111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 Tel. (415) 464-4300 Fax (415) 464-4336 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHEVRON GLOBAL 7 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES COMPANY, (formerly known as CHEVRONTEXACO 8 GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES COMPANY) and CHEVRON INTERNATIONAL EXPLORATION 9 AND PRODUCTION COMPANY (formerly known as CHEVRONTEXACO OVERSEAS PETROLEUM), 10 a Division of CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. 11 Mark Russakow (SBN 162472) mrussakow@rrjlaw.com 12 Lisa Tan (SBN 228326) lltan@rrjlaw.com 13 RUSSAKOW | RYAN | JOHNSON A Professional Law Corporation 14 225 S. Lake Avenue, 10th Floor Pasadena, CA 91101 15 Tel: (626) 683-8869 Fax: (626) 683-8870 16 Attorneys for Defendant 17 MICHAEL S. LITTLE 18 19 20 CHEVRON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY 21 SERVICES COMPANY, (formerly known as CHEVRONTEXACO GLOBAL 22 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES COMPANY) and CHEVRON INTERNATIONAL 23 EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY (formerly known as 24 CHEVRONTEXACO OVERSEAS PETROLEUM), a Division of 25 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. 26 Plaintiffs, 27 v. 28 MICHAEL S. LITTLE, 1 A P R O F E S S I O N A L CORPORATION S A N FRANCISCO, C A L I F O R N I A M I L L E R LAW GROUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. C 06 3157 MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES 1 2 3 4 (CHEVRON Defendant. Plaintiffs CHEVRON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES COMPANY "GLOBETECH"), SERVICES AND formerly known as CHEVRONTEXACO CHEVRON ("CIEP"), GLOBAL 5 TECHNOLOGY 6 EXPLORATION COMPANY, and INTERNATIONAL known as PRODUCTION COMPANY formerly 7 CHEVRONTEXACO OVERSEAS PETROLEUM, a division of CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 8 (referred to collectively as "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Michael S. Little ("Defendant"), through 9 their respective counsel agree and stipulate as follows: 10 11 WHEREAS, on December 18, 2009, the Court ordered the Parties to file briefs 12 in support of their respective Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment by February 5, 2010 in 13 the above-referenced Action, with the Parties' opposition and reply briefs to follow, and to A P R O F E S S I O N A L CORPORATION S A N FRANCISCO, C A L I F O R N I A M I L L E R LAW GROUP 14 appear before the Court for a hearing on the Cross Motions for Summary Judgment on 15 March 12, 2010; 16 17 WHEREAS, the Parties are endeavoring to finalize a settlement of the Action 18 and agree that the current filing deadline should be modified to provide sufficient time for the 19 parties to complete their settlement negotiations; 20 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and NOW , THEREFORE, 24 Defendant, by and through their respective undersigned attorneys of record, to extend the 25 deadline for filing the Parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment to February 12, 2010 26 and extend all associated deadlines and the hearing date accordingly: 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A P R O F E S S I O N A L CORPORATION S A N FRANCISCO, C A L I F O R N I A February 12, 2010 Last day for the Parties to file and serve CrossMotions for Summary Judgment. February 26, 2010 Last day for the parties to file and serve Opposition to Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Last day for the parties to file and serve Reply briefs in support of their respective Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Hearings on parties Motions for Summary Judgment. March 5, 2010 _____________, 2010 Good cause exists for extending the existing deadline for filing the Parties' CrossMotions for Summary Judgment, and all associated deadlines, as set forth above. M I L L E R LAW GROUP 14 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: February 4, 2010 RUSSAKOW RYAN JOHNSON A Professional Law Corporation By: 19 20 21 22 Dated: February 4, 2010 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 /S/ ________________________ Lisa Tan Attorneys for Defendant MICHAEL LITTLE MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation By: /S/ Katherine L. Kettler Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHEVRON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES COMPANY and CHEVRON INTERNATIONAL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION, a division of CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 1 2 3 ORDER Having reviewed the Stipulation executed by Plaintiffs CHEVRON GLOBAL 4 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES COMPANY and CHEVRON INTERNATIONAL EXPLORATION 5 AND PRODUCTION and Defendant MICHAEL LITTLE, and good cause appearing, the 6 Court hereby orders that the March 12, 2010 hearing on the parties Cross-Motions for 7 Summary Judgment and associated dates are VACATED, and are rescheduled pursuant to 8 the schedule set forth below. 9 10 11 12 13 A P R O F E S S I O N A L CORPORATION S A N FRANCISCO, C A L I F O R N I A _Febr__ry_12 ___, 2010 ___ ua _ __ Last day for the Parties to file and serve CrossMotions for Summary Judgment. _Febr__ry_26 ___, 2010 ___ ua _ __ Last day for the parties to file and serve Opposition to Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. M I L L E R LAW GROUP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 4851-1507-6357, v. 1 Ma _ h 5 ____rc________, 2010 Last day for the parties to file and serve Reply briefs in support of their respective Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Hearings on parties Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Ma _ h 26 ____rc________, 2010 IT IS SO ORDERED. February 8, 2010 Dated: ________________________ _______________________________ The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?