Ingrid von Mangoldt Hills v. Intensive Air Inc.

Filing 137

ORDER GRANTING 136 Stipulation RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/3/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT T. LYNCH (SB# 34716) CLAUDIA LOZANO (SB#188742) ELIA DE LUCA (SB#249059) LYNCH, GILARDI & GRUMMER 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 397-2800 Facsimile: (415) 397-0937 Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Defendant INTENSIVE AIR, INC., DBA U.S. AIR AMBULANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION INGRID VON MANGOLDT HILLS, in her individual capacity and as Representative of the Estate of REUBEN W. HILLS, III, Plaintiffs, vs. INTENSIVE AIR, INC., a corporation, doing business as U.S. AIR AMBULANCE, Defendant. _____________________________________ INTENSIVE AIR, INC., a corporation, doing business as U.S. AIR AMBULANCE, Cross-Complainant, vs. MEDICAL AIR TRANSPORT, INC., MEDICAL AIR TRANSPORT RESOURCES, JEREMY FREER and MICHAEL QUILTER, Cross-Defendants. Case No.: C 06-3300 JSW STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION [FRCP RULE 41(a)] Case Filed: Trial Date: 5/19/06 N/A 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION [FRCP RULE 41(a)] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), plaintiff INGRID von MANGOLDT HILLS has agreed to voluntarily dismiss the instant lawsuit, with prejudice against Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Claimant INTENSIVE AIR, INC. CrossCross- Defendant/Cross-Complainants INTENSIVE AIR, INC., MICHAEL QUILTER, Defendant/Cross-Claimant MEDICAL AIR TRANSPORT, INC. and Cross-Defendant JEREMY FREER have agreed to dismiss all cross-complaints, with prejudice, in this matter in exchange for a waiver of costs. The parties request that the Case Management Conference currently set for March 6, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable Jeffrey S. White be taken off calendar and that dismissal of the Complaint and Cross-Complaints be dismissed. Counsel stipulate that a copy of a signature transmitted by any electronic means including, but not limited to, facsimile machine and scanned document transmitted via e-mail will have the same force and effect as an original signature. DATED: February 27, 2009 LYNCH, GILARDI & GRUMMER By /s/ Robert T. Lynch Claudia Lozano Attorneys for Defendant/CrossDefendant, INTENSIVE AIR, INC., DBA U.S. AIR AMBULANCE DATED: February 27, 2009 BREALL & BREALL, LLP By: _____/s/_________________________ Joseph M. Breall Attorney for Plaintiff INGRID VON MANGOLDT HILLS, in her individual capacity and as Representative of the Estate of REUBEN W. HILLS, III 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION [FRCP RULE 41(a)] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: February 27, 2009 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY By /s/ George E. Clause Daniel McKinnon Attorneys for Cross-Defendant/CrossComplainant, MICHAEL QUILTER, DATED: February 27, 2009 THE WALSTON LEGAL GROUP By /s/ Gregory S. Walston Orestes A. Cross Attorneys for Cross-Defendant, JEREMY FREER DATED: February 27, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF BONNIE R. COHEN By____/s/________________________________ Bonnie R. Cohen Attorneys for Cross-Defendant/ Cross-Complainant MEDICAL AIR TRANSPORT, INC. 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION [FRCP RULE 41(a)] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION [FRCP RULE 41(a)] \\Sfdata\Conversion\0010-0155\P\187089.doc ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, the stipulation to dismiss the Complaint and all CrossComplaints, with prejudice, all parties to bear their own costs, is GRANTED. The Case Management Conference scheduled for March 6, 2009 is vacated. March 3, 2009 DATED:__________________ ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?