"CONSOLIDATED ACTION" In re OPENWAVE SYSTEMS, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LIGITATION ( Hacker v. Peterschmidt et al)

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT re 7 Stipulation filed by Manfred Hacker,. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/21/2006. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2006)

"CONSOLIDATED ACTION" In re OPENWAVE SYSTEMS, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATI...ker v. Peterschmidt et al)

Doc. 8

Case 3:06-cv-03468-SI

Document 8

Filed 06/21/2006

Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SCOTT + SCOTT, LLC ARTHUR L. SHINGLER III (181719) 600 B Street, Suite 1500 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 619.233.0508 Counsel for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION _______________________________________ CASE NO.: 06-cv-03468-MEJ

) ) MANFRED HACKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) DAVID PETERSCHMIDT; DONALD LISTWIN; JOSHUA PACE; STEVEN PETERS; ) ) AL SNYDER; SIMON WILKINSON; ) KENNETH DENMAN; BO HEDFORS; ) GERALD HELD; MASOOD JABBAR; ) BERNARD PUCKETT, ) ) ) Defendants, ) ) -and) ) OPENWAVE SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Nominal Defendant. ) ________________________________________ )

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING AMENDED COMPLAINT

Stipulation. and [Proposed] Order Re Filing Amended Complaint Case No. 06-cv-03467-MEJ
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:06-cv-03468-SI

Document 8

Filed 06/21/2006

Page 2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the Complaint; 2006;

STIPULATION WHEREAS, the original Complaint in the above-captioned action was filed on May 30,

WHEREAS, by their respective undersigned counsel, each defendant accepts service of

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15, plaintiff intends to amend the Complaint; WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred concerning the filing of an Amended Complaint and an appropriate schedule for defendants' responses thereto; WHEREAS, the parties hereto believe this Stipulation is in the best interest of judicial economy; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to approval of the Court: A. B. Plaintiff shall file and serve an Amended Complaint no later than July 17, 2006; Defendants shall file and serve their respective responses thereto no later than

August 18, 2006; C. Should any defendant's response be a motion to dismiss, plaintiff's opposition

thereto shall be filed and served no later than September 8, 2006; and D. Any reply in support to a motion to dismiss shall thereafter be filed and served no

later than September 15, 2006. Dated: June 20, 2006 By:__/s/ Garrett J. Waltzer ____________ Garrett J. Waltzer ( 130764) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Amy S. Park (208204)
Stipulation. and [Proposed] Order Re Filing Amended Complaint Case No. 06-cv-03468-MEJ

-1-

Case 3:06-cv-03468-SI

Document 8

Filed 06/21/2006

Page 3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Stipulation. and [Proposed] Order Re Filing Amended Complaint Case No. 06-cv-03468-MEJ

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3144 Attorneys for Defendants Kenneth Denman, Bo Hedfors, Masood Jabbar and Bernard Puckett

Dated: June 20, 2006

By:_ /s/ Lee H. Rubin _______________ Lee H. Rubin, (141331) Shirish Gupta, (205584) MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306 Attorneys for Defendants Don Listwin, Joshua Pace, Dave Peterschmidt, Allen Snyder, Simon Wilkinson

Dated: June 20, 2006

By:__ /s/ Jeff K. Li _________________ Jeff K. Li (186305) OPENWAVE SYSTEMS, INC. 2100 Seaport Boulevard Redwood City, CA 94063 Attorney for Defendant Openwave Systems, Inc.

Dated: June 20, 2006

By:__/s/ Arthur L. Shingler III ________ Arthur L. Shingler III (181719) SCOTT + SCOTT, LLC 600 B Street, Suite 1500 San Diego, CA 92101 Attorney for Plaintiff

-2-

Case 3:06-cv-03468-SI

Document 8

Filed 06/21/2006

Page 4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. C.

[PROPOSED] ORDER Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing: A. B. Plaintiff shall file and serve an Amended Complaint no later than July 17, 2006; Defendants shall file and serve their respective responses thereto no later than

August 18, 2006; and shall also file the magistrate judge consent/declination form at that time. Should any defendant's response be a motion to dismiss, plaintiff's opposition

thereto shall be filed and served no later than September 8, 2006; and D. Any reply in support to a motion to dismiss shall thereafter be filed and served no

later than September 15, 2006.

UNIT ED

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

Stipulation. and [Proposed] Order Re Filing Amended Complaint Case No. 06-cv-03468-MEJ

-3-

A

C

LI

FO

United States District Judge s na Jame aria-Ele Judge M

R NIA

ERED O ORD _______________________________ IT IS S

S

June 21, 2006 Dated: _______________________

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

NO

RT

H

Case 3:06-cv-03468-SI

Document 8

Filed 06/21/2006

Page 5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, Arthur L. Shingler III, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Filing Amended Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that each of the counsel executing the Stipulation has concurred in this filing.

Dated: June 20, 2006

SCOTT + SCOTT, LLC By: /s/ Arthur L. Shingler III Arthur L. Shingler III Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Stipulation. and [Proposed] Order Re Filing Amended Complaint Case No. 06-cv-03468-MEJ

-4-