Thomas v. Ponder et al
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of G. Ponder, M. J. Kircher, M. S. Evans against Otis Michael Thomas. 1. Defendants motion for summary judgment are hereby GRANTED and judgment shall be entered in favor of each of the defendants.2. Plaintiffs motions for judicial notice are hereby DENIED (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Deputy Clerk Dated: February 24, 2009 v. M.S. EVANS, Warden, et al., Defendants. / OTIS THOMAS, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. CV-06-3581 MMC (PR) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. Defendants motion for summary judgment are hereby GRANTED and judgment shall be entered in favor of each of the defendants. 2. Plaintiff's motions for judicial notice are hereby DENIED.
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Tracy Lucero
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?