Thomas v. Pfizer, Incorporated et al

Filing 38

ORDER re June 9, 2009 Submission. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/10/2009. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/10/2009: # 1 Certificate of Service) (be, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: BEXTRA AND CELEBREX 11 MARKETING SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, 12 13 14 CASE NO. 05-1699 CRB MDL No. 1699 CRB ORDER RE JUNE 9, 2009 SUBMISSION / This document relates to: Edward Earl Thomas, 06-3674 CRB 15 ___________________________________/ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court is in receipt of a letter from pro se plaintiff Edward Earl Thomas, received on June 9, 2009. The Court cannot discern the purpose of Plaintiff's letter; in addition, while Plaintiff refers to his case, he also refers to a case not pending in this court, 05-1657. Plaintiff captions his letter as a "Motion to Request to Show Cause etc." Plaintiff's motion asks the Court to tell Plaintiff "if we need to sue," asserts that there "needs to be [a] `Universal Medication'" for pain and stress, and states that Plaintiff needs the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and other numerous legal documents. The Court is unable to discern the point of Plaintiff's letter. Accordingly, to the extent Plaintiff has made a motion to this Court it is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 10, 2009 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\ordersmisc\orderrethomas3.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?