San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. GE Transportation Systems Global Signaling LLC

Filing 115

ORDER GRANTING 114 Stipulation DISMISSING THE FOURTH AND SIXTH COUNTS OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/30/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2009)

Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document114

Filed11/20/09 Page1 of 3

I
2 J
a

4
5

John W. Crowley (State Bar No. 039041) Robert B. Stringer (State Bar No. 056148) Mark D. Fenske (State Bar No. 160640) Crowley, Stringer & Fenske LLP 456 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-1250 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

E-mail: [e-mail]
Attomeys for Plaintiffl Counterdefendant SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT

6 7
8

9 10
11

72
1a IJ

A. Bruen (State Bar No. 43880) Charles M. Sink (State Bar No. 078168) Carl E. Switzer (State Bar No. 211858) Arjun Agarwal (State Bar No. 233576) Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor SanFrancisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
James

E-mail:[e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC

T4

i5
16
T7 18

LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

r9
20

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTzuCT.

Case No. C 06-3749 JSV/

Plaintiff,
2T

STTPULATION AND IPROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING THE FOURTH AND SIXTH COUNTS OF THE THIRI) AMENDED COMPLAINT IF.R.Civ.P. 41(a)ì
Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. V/hite

22

GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
^J ¿a

GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC,

1A

Complaint Filed: June 13, 2006 August 30,2010 Trial Date:

25

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM
26 27
28
Filrcllil Brrun & MMcl LLP 235 ilfonrgonrcry Súccl, lTLh Flær

Sln Frilcisco, CA

91 104

(415) 954.44m

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING 4TH AND 6TH COTINTS OF THIRD AMENDED

-1-

Case

No. C 06-3749 JSW

COMPLAINT

Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document114

Filed11/20/09 Page2 of 3

I
2
a J
A +

STIPULATION
Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff SAN

FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTzuCT ("BART") and defendant GE

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC ("GETS") hereby stipulate that:
1. GETS did not terminate the Phase 2 Work

5

within the meaning of Articles SC8.3 and

6 7
8

P8.4 of the contract that is the subject of this lawsuit, and, therefore, the Court may order the

dismissal of the Fourth Count of BART's Third Amended Complaint; and

2. The Sixth Count of BART's Third Amended Complaint presently is procedurally
inappropriate, and the Court may order its dismissal.

9 10
11

DATED:

NOVEMbET

TI,2OO9

CROWLEY, STRTNGER & FENSKE LLP

T2
1a IJ

t4
15
T6

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT

t7
tð r9
20

DATED: November ).1, 2009

l?/

FARELLA BRALIN + MARTELLLP

2l
22
¿J

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC

24
25
./.o

27
28
F¡rcllå Brautr & Mdcl LLP 235 MonLgonrcry Strcc\ lTtI Floor Silil Frailcisco, CA 94104 (1 r5) 954f4m

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING 4TH AND 6TH COUNTS OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case

No. C 06-3749 JSW

Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document114

Filed11/20/09 Page3 of 3

1

ORDER

2
a

PI]RSUANT TO STIPULATION,

TT

IS SO ORDERED.

J

3 DATED: November0 ,2009

4
5

6 1
8

JEFFREY S. WHITE JUDGE OF THE LINITED STATES DISTzuCT COIIRT

9 10
11

I2
1a

IJ
1Á

t+

15

i6
T7

18

t9
20
2T

22

¿)
24
25

26 27
28
Farclh Brrun & Nfmcl LLP 235 MotrtgoilrcrySÍcct, l7ür Flæt
Sâtr Frâtrc¡sco,

CA

91 104

({15) 951{1m

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING 4TH AND 6TH COUNTS OF THIRD AMENDED

3-

Case

No. C 06-3749 JSW

COMPLAINT