San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. GE Transportation Systems Global Signaling LLC

Filing 173

ORDER GRANTING 171 Stipulation To Exceed Page Limits for Reply Briefs in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/15/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2010)

Download PDF
Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document171 Filed04/14/10 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James A. Bruen (State Bar No. 43880) Charles M. Sink (State Bar No. 78168) Thomas B. Mayhew (State Bar No. 183539) Carl E. Switzer (State Bar No. 211858) Arjun Agarwal (State Bar No. 233576) Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415-954-4480 E-Mail: jbruen@fbm.com E-Mail: csink@fbm.com E-Mail: tmayhew@fbm.com E-Mail: cswitzer@fbm.com E-Mail: aagarwal@fbm.com Ned N. Isokawa (State Bar No. 66287) Paul, Hastings, Janofsky& Walker LLP 55 Second Street Twent y-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-856-7000 Facsimile: 415-856-7100 E-Mail: nedisokawa@paulhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Plaint iff, vs. GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC, Defendant. CASE NO. C 06-3749 JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Date : Time: Courtroom: Judge: May 14, 2010 9:00 a.m. 11, 19th Floor Hon. Jeffrey S. White June 13, 2006 August 30, 2010 Complaint Filed: Trial Date: AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR REPLY BRIEFS 18972\2233987.1 Case No. C 06-3749 JSW Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document171 Filed04/14/10 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the parties' reply briefs in support of their motions for summary judgment are due to be filed by April 16, 2010; WHEREAS defendant GE Transportation Systems Global Signaling, LLC ("GETS") submits that good cause exists to allow the reply briefs to exceed the otherwise applicable limit of 15 pages for such reply briefs by up to 10 pages because (1) arguments raised in the opposition briefs were not addressed in the opening briefs, (2) BART filed eight declarations in support of its opposition brief, (3) 15 pages is otherwise insufficient because of the complexity of the case and the importance of the issues within the case; and (4) plaintiff San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District has agreed to stipulate to an increase in the number of pages permitted as an accommodation to GETS, and for the sake of reciprocity asks that any increase in the number of pages permitted apply to both parties; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court so order, that the parties may file reply briefs in support of their motions for summary judgment of up to 25 pages in length. DATED: April 14, 2010 FARELLA, BRAUN & MARTEL, LLP :______________________________________ THOMAS B. MAYHEW Attorneys for Defendant GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC DATED: April 14, 2010 CROWLEY, STRINGER & FENSKE LLP ______________________________________ ROBERT B. STRINGER Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR GETS' REPLY BRIEF -2- 18972\2233987.1 Case No. C 06-3749 JSW Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document171 Filed04/14/10 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR GETS' REPLY BRIEF ORDER Based on the parties' foregoing stipulation, and for good cause showing, the Court hereby orders that the parties may file reply briefs in support of their motions for summary judgment of up to 25 pages in length. Dated: April ___, 2010 15 Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge -3- 18972\2233987.1 Case No. C 06-3749 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?