San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. GE Transportation Systems Global Signaling LLC

Filing 299

ORDER GRANTING 298 Stipulation to Continue Status Conference or to Submit Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 3, 2010. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2010)

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. GE Transportation Systems Global Signaling LLC

Doc. 299

Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document298

Filed09/03/10 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

John W. Crowley (State Bar No. 039041) Robert B. Stringer (State Bar No. 056148) Crowley, Stringer & Fenske LLP 456 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor SanFrancisco, CA 94104-1250 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Additional Counsel on Signature Page James A. Bruen (State Bar No. 43880) Charles M. Sink (State Bar No. 078168) Thomas B. Mayhew (State Bar No. 183539) Carl E. Switzer (State Bar No. 211858) Arjun Agarwal (State Bar No. 233576) FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] Additional Counsel on Signature Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Plaintiff, vs. GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC, Defendant. CaseNo. C 06 3749 JSW STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: Complaint Filed: Trial Date: September 3, 2010 1:30 p.m. 11,19th floor Hon. Jeffrey S. White June 13,2006 None (vacated)

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

CaseNo. C 06 3749 JSW

Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document298

Filed09/03/10 Page2 of 3

1

On August 13, 2010, the parties informed the Court they had reached a settlement following mediation. Based on such advice and the parties' stipulation, the Court scheduled a status conference for September 3, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. The parties are still in the process of finalizing the settlement agreement, because it includes provisions regarding the transfer of technology, and certain individuals whose approval is required to finalize the agreement are currently travelling. The parties therefore stipulate that the Court may continue the status conference. The parties respectfully ask the Court to order the conference continued for two weeks, to Friday, September 17, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. DATED: September 3, 2010 CROWLEY, STRINGER, FENSKE LLP

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28

By
L W. Crowley Additional Counsel Richard Rosenberg (State Bar No. 067336) Rosenberg Law Firm 456 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-1250 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff SanFrancisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District DATED: September 3, 2010 FARELLA B: TEL, LLP

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

-2-

Case No. C 06 3749 JSW

Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document298

Filed09/03/10 Page3 of 3

1
2

Additional Counsel NedN. Isokawa (State Bar No. 066287) Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP 55 Second Street Twenty-Fourth Floor SanFrancisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] rPROPOSEDl ORDER PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED Should the parties file a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal prior to September 17, 2010, the status conference shall be vacated. DATED: September 3, 2010

3 4 5

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: September 3, 2010
14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER T

Hon. Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

"5 '

Case N a c 06 3749 J S W