Mi Pueblo San Jose, Inc. et al v. City of Oakland

Filing 11

ORDER. On June 30, 2006, plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging, inter alia, that the City of Oakland illegally revoked their building permits. Doc #1, 35-44. On July 7, 2006, plaintiffs filed an ex parte application for issuance of a temporary rest raining order and order to show cause regarding a preliminary injunction. Doc #3. The court ORDERS the City to file a response to plaintiffs' application no later than July 14, 2006, at 12:00 PM. If the City does not respond, the matter will be scheduled for hearing on plaintiffs' motion and an order to show cause why the City should not reinstate plaintiffs' building permits. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 7/10/2006. (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2006).

Mi Pueblo San Jose, Inc. et al v. City of Oakland

Doc. 11

Case 3:06-cv-04094-VRW

Document 11

Filed 07/10/2006

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MI PUEBLO SAN JOSE, INC and CHA CHA ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiffs, v CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant. /

No

C-06-4094 VRW ORDER

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On June 30, 2006, plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging, inter alia, that the City of Oakland illegally revoked their building permits. Doc #1, ¶¶ 35-44. On July 7, 2006, plaintiffs

filed an ex parte application for issuance of a temporary restraining order and order to show cause regarding a preliminary injunction. Doc #3.

The court ORDERS the City to file a response to plaintiffs' application no later than July 14, 2006, at 12:00 PM. If the City does not respond, the matter will be scheduled for hearing on plaintiffs' motion and an order to show cause why the City should not reinstate plaintiffs' building permits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge

Dockets.Justia.com