Mi Pueblo San Jose, Inc. et al v. City of Oakland

Filing 11

ORDER. On June 30, 2006, plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging, inter alia, that the City of Oakland illegally revoked their building permits. Doc #1, 35-44. On July 7, 2006, plaintiffs filed an ex parte application for issuance of a temporary rest raining order and order to show cause regarding a preliminary injunction. Doc #3. The court ORDERS the City to file a response to plaintiffs' application no later than July 14, 2006, at 12:00 PM. If the City does not respond, the matter will be scheduled for hearing on plaintiffs' motion and an order to show cause why the City should not reinstate plaintiffs' building permits. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 7/10/2006. (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2006).

Download PDF
Mi Pueblo San Jose, Inc. et al v. City of Oakland Doc. 11 Case 3:06-cv-04094-VRW Document 11 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MI PUEBLO SAN JOSE, INC and CHA CHA ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiffs, v CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant. / No C-06-4094 VRW ORDER United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On June 30, 2006, plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging, inter alia, that the City of Oakland illegally revoked their building permits. Doc #1, 35-44. On July 7, 2006, plaintiffs filed an ex parte application for issuance of a temporary restraining order and order to show cause regarding a preliminary injunction. Doc #3. The court ORDERS the City to file a response to plaintiffs' application no later than July 14, 2006, at 12:00 PM. If the City does not respond, the matter will be scheduled for hearing on plaintiffs' motion and an order to show cause why the City should not reinstate plaintiffs' building permits. IT IS SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?