California Alliance of Child and Family Services v. Allenby et al

Filing 98

ORDER re 2/26/2010 Letter; plaintiff to file written response within ten days; Defendants to file a written response within ten days thereafter; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 3/10/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. CLIFF ALLENBY, Interim Director of the California Department of Social Services, in his official capacity, and MARY AULT, Deputy Director of the Children and Family Services Division of the California Department of Social Services, in her official capacity, Defendants. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff, No. C 06-4095 MHP Related to No. C 09-4398 MHP ORDER Re: February 26, 2010 letter requesting amended judgment United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On February 24, 2010, this Court issued a judgment in this action. Docket No. 92. Two days later, counsel for defendants apprised the court of their concerns with the judgment. Docket No. 93. The court seeks a response from plaintiff regarding defendants' claim that Welfare and Institutions Code section 121462(m) is not part of the RCL rate-setting methodology. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a written response, not to exceed five (5) pages, regarding solely this issue. Defendants may file a written response, not to exceed five (5) pages, within ten (10) days of plaintiff's submission. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 10, 2010 MARILYN HALL PATEL United States District Court Judge Northern District of California United States District Court For the Northern District of California 28 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?