Hagstrom Properties, L.L.C. v. Dow Cleaners et al

Filing 104

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of the action, it is ordered that plaintiff's claims be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, this order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 13, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 13, 2008 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge v. DOW CLEANERS, et al., Defendants / HAGSTROM PROPERTIES, L.L.C., Plaintiff, No. C 06-4338 MMC ORDER OF DISMISSAL United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of the above-titled action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims alleged herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?