Medtronic Inc. et al v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.

Filing 542

ORDER RULING ON REMAINDER OF MOTIONS TO SEAL: 481 MOTION to Seal Document 461 MOTION to Seal Document 469 MOTION to Seal Document 412 MOTION to Seal Document 484 MOTION to Seal Document. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/11/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MEDTRONIC, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant. / On July 30, 2009, this Court issued an Order reserving ruling on certain portions of varied and sundry motions to seal filed by the parties. Having considered the parties' Local Rule 79-5 Declarations, submitted in response to that Order, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 1. Docket No. 412 No. 06-04455 JSW ORDER RULING ON REMAINDER OF MOTIONS TO SEAL - Docket Nos. 412, 461, 469, 481 and 484. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Exhibits B and C to Gore's Opposition to Medtronic's Motion for Leave shall be filed under seal. 2. Docket No. 461 Pursuant to the Declaration of Marguerite E. Gerstner (Document 539), Exhibit M to the Declaration of Jennifer BianRosa in Support of Gore's Motion in Limine No. 2 shall be filed under seal. The request to file Exhibit N under seal is denied, and Gore shall file that Exhibit in the public record by August 14, 2009. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pursuant to the Declaration of Ellen Wang, filed on August 3, 2009 (Docket No. 537), Exhibit C to the Declaration of Jennifer BianRosa in Support of Gore's Motion in Limine No. 6 shall be filed under seal. Pursuant to the Wang Declaration, the request to file under seal Exhibits P and S to the Declaration of Jennifer BianRosa in Support of Gore's Motion in Limine No. 2 and Exhibits 2 and 21 to the Declaration of Ellen J. Wang in Support of Medtronic's Oppositions to Gore's Motion in Limine is denied. Gore shall file these documents in the public record by August 14, 2009. The Court notes that Exhibit 28 to the Wang Declaration in Support of Medtronic's Oppositions to Gore's Motion in Limine also was lodged under seal. However, neither Gore nor Medtronic addressed that document in the motions to seal pending before the Court. Accordingly, the parties are HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Exhibit 28 should not be filed in the public record. The parties' responses are due by no later than August 14, 2009. Failure to file a response by that date shall result in the Court requiring Exhibit 28 to be filed in the public record. 3. Docket No. 469 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the Declaration of Ellen Wang filed on August 3, 2009 (Docket No. 538), the request to file under seal portions of Exhibit A to its Designated Testimony as to which Medtronic objected is DENIED. Gore shall file that Exhibit in the public record by August 14, 2009. 4. Docket No. 481. Pursuant to the Declaration of Jennifer BianRosa filed on August 3, 2009 (Docket No. 536), the request to file (1) portions of Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Disputed Jury Instructions; (2) portions of Plaintiffs' Responsive Memorandum of Law in Support of Disputed Jury Instructions; (3) and portions of Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Daniel B. Epstein in Support of Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Disputed Jury Instructions is granted. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The request to file Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Daniel B. Epstein in Support of Medtronic's Memorandum of Law in Support of Disputed Jury instructions is DENIED. Medtronic shall file a public version of that document by August 14, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 11, 2009 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?