Pollard v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
100
ORDER. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to inform the court in writing by not later than September 24, 2010 the status of her attempt to secure pro bono assistance or to obtain new counsel. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2010)
<![CDATA[
Pollard v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Doc. 100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On May 28, 2010, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Doc #93. In her response, plaintiff V CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL, Defendants. / ELVIRA POLLARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF GUSTAVAS RUGLEY, JR, Plaintiff, No C 06-4541 ORDER VRW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
requested additional time to seek funds from the Federal Pro Bono Project or to seek the assistance of a new attorney. Doc #95 at 4.
Plaintiff is DIRECTED to inform the court in writing by not later
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
than September 24, 2010 the status of her attempt to secure pro bono assistance or to obtain new counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
