Bartholomew v. British Airways, PLC et al

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending defendant's time to respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 8/21/06. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2006)

Download PDF
Bartholomew v. British Airways, PLC et al Doc. 7 Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP EDWARD D. JOHNSON (SBN 189475) SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584) Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-4537 wjohnson@mayerbrownrowe.com sgupta@mayerbrownrowe.com MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP RICHARD J. FAVRETTO 1909 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 263-3000 Facsimile: (202) 263-3300 rfavretto@mayerbrownrowe.com Attorneys for Defendants UNITED AIR LINES, INC. Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SUSAN BARTHOLOMEW, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BRITISH AIRWAYS, PLC, VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS LIMITED, and UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Defendants. CASE NO. CV 06-04793-SC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, in light of the transfer motion now pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") captioned In re International Air Transportation Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1793, Plaintiff STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV 06-04793-SC Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Susan Bartholomew ("Plaintiff") and Defendants British Airways Plc, Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited, and United Air Lines, Inc. (collectively, the "Defendants"), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants' time to answer, move or otherwise plead is enlarged until the later of (1) the date when the Defendants would otherwise be required to file a response pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, or (2) 45 days after the JPML rules on the pending motion and consolidates each related action in a single court, and a consolidated complaint is filed by all plaintiffs in the single transferee Court and served on Defendants. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that each defense counsel designated below shall accept service on behalf of the Defendant represented by each such counsel of all complaints in the above-captioned matter, including any amended or consolidated complaints, and further, that such Defendant shall not contest sufficiency of process or service of process. This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any other defense including, but not limited to, the defenses of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction or improper venue. Nothing in this paragraph shall obligate any Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to any complaint until the time provided in the preceding paragraph. The above notwithstanding, should any Defendant, except pursuant to court order, respond to any complaint in a related matter filed in another United States District Court prior to the date contemplated by this stipulation, then such Defendant shall make a simultaneous response to the complaint in the above-captioned matter. Respectfully submitted, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV 06-04793-SC -2- Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 15, 2006 GREEN WELLING LLP /s/ ______ Robert S. Green (SBN 136183) Jenelle Welling (SBN 209480) GREEN WELLING LLP 595 Market Street, Suite 2750 San Francisco, CA 94105 T: (415) 477-6700 F: (415) 477-6710 Dated: August 15, 2006 Attorneys for Plaintiff Susan Bartholomew MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP /s/ ______ Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475) MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306 T: (650) 331-2000 F: (650) 331-4537 Richard J. Favretto MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 1909 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Dated: August 15, 2006 Attorneys for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc. SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP /s/ Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 T: (650) 461-5600 F: (650) 461-5700 Daryl A. Libow SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006 Attorneys for Defendant British Airways Plc -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV 06-04793-SC Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: August 15, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP /s/ Harrison J. Frahn (SBN 206822) SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2550 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 T: (650) 251-5000 F: (650) 251-5002 Charles E. Koob (SBN 47349) SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 Attorneys for Defendant Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Shirish Gupta 12 hereby attests that the signatories' concurrences in the filing of this document have been obtained. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV 06-04793-SC PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: DISTRI Date: 8/21/06 UNIT ED S S TE TA CT C Honorable Judge SamuelEConti R H N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO Judge S onti amuel C -4- R NIA IT IS S O ORD ERED RT U O NO RT Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE I am employed in Santa Clara County, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300, Palo Alto, California 94306-2112. On August 15, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT on each interested party, as follows: by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Palo Alto, California addressed as set forth below. by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed facsimile & U.S. Mail envelope and affixing a pre-paid air bill, and causing the envelope to be delivered to a facsimile & U.S. Mail agent for delivery. by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below. Robert S. Green GREEN WELLING LLP 595 Market Street, Suite 2750 San Francisco, CA 94105 Harrison J. Frahn SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2550 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 Brendan P. Cullen SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Daryl A. Libow SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV 06-04793-SC -5- Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Charles E. Koob SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the above is true and correct. Executed on August 15, 2006, at Palo Alto, California. /s/ JESSICA F. DAVIS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV 06-04793-SC -6-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?