Madden et al v. Cowen & Company et al

Filing 77

ORDER DENYING 76 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on February 18, 2010. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2010)

Case3:06-cv-04886-JSW Document76

Filed02/17/10 Page1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Tammy Albarrán, SB #215605 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Linda C. Goldstein (pro hac vice) Simon G. Brandler COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018-1405 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants COWEN & COMPANY, SG COWEN SECURITIES CORPORATION and COWEN & COMPANY, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CHARLES T. MADDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, -vCOWEN & COMPANY, a New York limited partnership; SG COWEN SECURITIES CORPORATION, a New York corporation; COWEN & COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. Civil Case No.: C-06-4886 (JSW) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Date: April 16, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 11, 19th Floor Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Civil Case No. C-06-4886 (JSW)

Case3:06-cv-04886-JSW Document76

Filed02/17/10 Page2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, on December 18, 2009, this Court entered an order setting forth the schedule for briefing Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (the "Order"), and provided that should "counsel wish to modify the schedule, they shall submit a stipulation and proposed order setting forth an alternative briefing schedule"; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Remand on January 29, 2010 and Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand on February 12, 2010, in accordance with the Order; WHEREAS, the Order further provides that Plaintiffs shall file their reply brief by February 26, 2010, Defendants shall file their reply brief by March 5, 2010, and oral argument shall be held on April 16, 2010; WHEREAS, the Order provides Plaintiffs two weeks in which to prepare their reply brief and Defendants only one week in which to prepare their reply brief; The parties hereby stipulate as follows: The date for filing the reply brief on Defendants' motion to dismiss is adjourned from March 5, 2010 until March 12, 2010. All other dates set forth in the Order shall remain the same.

DATED: February 17, 2010

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

By: /s/ Tammy Albarrán Tammy Albarrán Attorneys for Defendants DATED: February 17, 2010 BOROWSKY & HAYES LLP

By: /s/ Christopher J. Hayes Christopher J. Hayes 100 Spear Street, Suite 1640 San Francisco, CA 94105-1571 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Civil Case No. C-06-4886 (JSW)

Case3:06-cv-04886-JSW Document76

Filed02/17/10 Page4 of 4

Plaintiffs were provided two weeks to file an opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss and a reply in support of their motion to remand. Defendants merely need to prepare a reply brief and so 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. the Court DENIES the parties' request. This Order is without prejudice to the parties submitting a revised stipulation to alter the 3 briefing schedule upon a showing of good cause. 4 DATED: February 18, 2010 ___________________ By: Hon. Jeffrey S. White 5 United States District Judge 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Civil Case No. C-06-4886 (JSW)