G&C Auto Body Inc et al v. GEICO General Insurance Company et al

Filing 422

ORDER GRANTING Dibble's Autobody's Administrative Relief and Continuing CMC and Hearing on pending motions. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/3/2008 09:00 AM. Motion Hearing set for 10/3/2008 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 09/04/08. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA G&C AUTO BODY INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF DIBBLE'S AUTOBODY'S REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF AND (2) CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS No. C 06-04898 JSW United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 / The Court HEREBY GRANTS the request for administrative relief filed by plaintiff Dibble's Autobody, the Collision Works, a sole proprietorship ("Dibble's Autobody") to file its declaration in opposition to the pending motions for leave to withdraw as counsel. The moving parties may file a supplemental reply brief to respond to Dibble's Autobody's declaration by no later than September 18, 2008. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that case management conference and the hearing on Defendants' motion for leave to amend and the motions to withdraw as counsel filed by McManis Faulkner and Colleen Duffy Smith are HEREBY /// /// /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CONTINUED to October 3, 2008. The case management conference will be heard following the hearing on the motions to withdraw. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 4, 2008 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?