Hub International of California Insurance Services, Inc v. Kilzer et al

Filing 58

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT MICHAEL KILZER'S MOTION TO DISSOLVE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. The motion is granted to the extent Kilzer seeks dissolution of the orders set forth in paragraphs B(1) and B(2) of the injunction. The motion is denied to the extent Kilzer seeks dissolution of the order set forth in paragraph B(3) of the injunction. Such denial is without prejudice to Kilzer's filing a separate motion, in which the grounds for dissolution of the remainder of the injunction, and the effect of such dissolution order on Kilzer's bankruptcy proceedings, are provided. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 14, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court HUB INTERNATIONAL OF CALIFORNIA INSURANCE SERVICES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL KILZER, et al., Defendants. / No. C-06-5227 MMC ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT MICHAEL KILZER'S MOTION TO DISSOLVE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before the Court is defendant Michael Kilzer's ("Kilzer") Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction, filed September 12, 2008, and noticed for hearing on October 17, 2008. No opposition has been filed. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a) (providing opposition must be filed no later than 21 days prior to date of hearing). Having read and considered the moving papers, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision thereon, hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for October 17, 2008, and rules as follows. Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED to the extent Kilzer seeks dissolution of the orders set forth in paragraphs B(1) and B(2) of said injunction. No showing having been made as to paragraph B(3), however, the motion is DENIED to the extent Kilzer seeks dissolution of the order set forth therein. Such denial is without prejudice to Kilzer's filing a separate motion, in which the grounds for dissolution of the remainder of said injunction, and the effect of such dissolution order on Kilzer's 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 bankruptcy proceedings, are provided. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 14, 2008 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?