PAI Corporation v. Integrated Science Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 252

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 18, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. INTEGRATED SCIENCE SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. / United States District Court PAI CORPORATION, Plaintiff, No. C-06-5349 JCS ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before the Court is defendants' "Ex Parte Application for Stay of Enforcement of Judgment Pending Determination of Defendants' Motion for New Trial and Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law," filed February 17, 2009. Having read and considered the application and the papers filed in support thereof, the Court hereby DENIES the application without prejudice, for the reason that defendants have failed to propose any terms for the posting of security to protect plaintiff's interest in the judgment or to explain why such security should not be required herein. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b) (providing "[o]n appropriate terms for the opposing party's security, the court may stay the execution of a judgment" pending disposition of motions for, inter alia, a new trial or judgment as a matter of law). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 18, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge, for JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?