Cuviello et al v. City Of Oakland et al

Filing 469

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND SETTING CMC FOR 8/10/12 AT 10:30 A.M. Case Management Statement due by 8/3/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/10/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/9/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 G. WHITNEY LEIGH (SBN 153457) GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP 744 Montgomery Street, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-912-5950 Facsimile: 415-912-5951 Attorneys for Plaintiff DENIZ BOLBOL JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO P.O. Box 2834 Redwood City, CA 94064 Telephone: (650) 654-9955 Plaintiff In Pro Se 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 Plaintiffs, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C06-05517 EMC (JCS) Related Case No. C09-02955 EMC (JCS) JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO AND DENIZ BOLBOL, INDIVIDUALLY, [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND SETTING FURTHER CMC v. CITY OF OAKLAND, A PUBLIC ENTITY, ALAMEDA COUNTY, A PUBLIC ENTITY, OAKLANDALAMEDA COLISEUM AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC ENITITY, OAKLAND COLISEUM JOINT VENTURE, L.L.C., SMG, OAKLAND POLICE OFFICER R. VALLADON (7184 P), OAKLAND POLICE OFFICER R. VILLEGAS, OAKLAND COLLISEUM ASSISTANT SECURITY MANAGER “SKEET” ELLIS, AND DOES 1-100, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, Defendants. 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case No. 06-CV-05517-EMC 1 2 On April 3, 2012, the plaintiffs and defendants reached a settlement of the above listed cases conducted by Honorable Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. 3 The settlement provides for a complete resolution of both related cases, No. C 06-CV- 4 05517 (the “first action”) and No. C 09-CV-02955 (the “second action”). The settlement also 5 provides for a permanent injunction set forth in the settlement agreement attached as Exhibit A 6 [Docket 460-2] to the Joint Status Conference Statement submitted by parties on April 11, 2012. 7 Intervenor, Feld Entertainment objected to the settlement. On April 27, 2012, the Court heard 8 arguments on Intervenor, Feld Entertainment’s objections. 9 The Court, having read and considered the supporting papers, and good cause appearing 10 therefore, makes the following order: 11 12 On April 27, 2012, the court heard and considered the objections to the settlement For the reasons stated on the record, the agreement of Intervenor, Feld Entertainment. / The objections were overruled and the settlement 13 agreement is APPROVED. I _________________________________ EDWARD M. ED CHEN ORDER SO T ISUnited States District Court Judge D AS MO 19 ER LI dwar Judge E A H 22 RT 21 en d M. Ch NO 20 IFIED R NIA 18 UNIT ED 17 5/9/12 Dated: _________________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 16 S 15 FO 14 A CMC is set for 8/10/12 at 10:30 a.m. and an updated CMC statement shall be filed by 8/3/12. This hearing will be IT IS SO ORDERED.vacated if a stipulation for dismissal is filed. N D IS T IC T R OF C 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case No. 06-CV-05517-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?