Cuviello et al v. City Of Oakland et al

Filing 469

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND SETTING CMC FOR 8/10/12 AT 10:30 A.M. Case Management Statement due by 8/3/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/10/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/9/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

G. WHITNEY LEIGH (SBN 153457)
GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP
744 Montgomery Street, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-912-5951
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DENIZ BOLBOL
JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO
P.O. Box 2834
Redwood City, CA 94064
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Plaintiff In Pro Se

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

Plaintiffs,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. C06-05517 EMC (JCS)
Related Case No. C09-02955 EMC (JCS)

JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO AND DENIZ
BOLBOL, INDIVIDUALLY,

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
AND SETTING FURTHER CMC

v.
CITY OF OAKLAND, A PUBLIC
ENTITY, ALAMEDA COUNTY, A
PUBLIC ENTITY, OAKLANDALAMEDA COLISEUM AUTHORITY, A
PUBLIC ENITITY, OAKLAND
COLISEUM JOINT VENTURE, L.L.C.,
SMG, OAKLAND POLICE OFFICER R.
VALLADON (7184 P), OAKLAND
POLICE OFFICER R. VILLEGAS,
OAKLAND COLLISEUM ASSISTANT
SECURITY MANAGER “SKEET” ELLIS,
AND DOES 1-100, IN THEIR
INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL
CAPACITIES JOINTLY AND
SEVERALLY,
Defendants.
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Case No. 06-CV-05517-EMC

1
2

On April 3, 2012, the plaintiffs and defendants reached a settlement of the above listed
cases conducted by Honorable Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero.

3

The settlement provides for a complete resolution of both related cases, No. C 06-CV-

4

05517 (the “first action”) and No. C 09-CV-02955 (the “second action”). The settlement also

5

provides for a permanent injunction set forth in the settlement agreement attached as Exhibit A

6

[Docket 460-2] to the Joint Status Conference Statement submitted by parties on April 11, 2012.

7

Intervenor, Feld Entertainment objected to the settlement. On April 27, 2012, the Court heard

8

arguments on Intervenor, Feld Entertainment’s objections.

9

The Court, having read and considered the supporting papers, and good cause appearing

10

therefore, makes the following order:

11
12

On April 27, 2012, the court heard and considered the objections to the settlement
For the reasons stated on the record, the
agreement of Intervenor, Feld Entertainment. / The objections were overruled and the settlement

13

agreement is APPROVED.

I

_________________________________
EDWARD M. ED
CHEN
ORDER
SO
T ISUnited States District Court Judge

D
AS MO

19

ER

LI

dwar
Judge E

A

H

22

RT

21

en

d M. Ch

NO

20

IFIED

R NIA

18

UNIT
ED

17

5/9/12
Dated: _________________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

16

S

15

FO

14

A CMC is set for 8/10/12 at 10:30 a.m. and an updated CMC
statement shall be filed by 8/3/12. This hearing will be
IT IS SO ORDERED.vacated if a stipulation for dismissal is filed.

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Case No. 06-CV-05517-EMC