Nelson v. Pitney Bowes, Inc. et al

Filing 60

Notice of Questions. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on November 13, 2008. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JONATHAN NELSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PITNEY BOWES, INC. and PITNEY BOWES GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants. / No. C 06-05954 JSW United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF QUESTIONS TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED ON NOVEMBER 14, 2008 AT 9:00 A.M.: The Court has reviewed the parties' papers and, thus, does not wish to hear the parties reargue matters addressed in those pleadings. If the parties intend to rely on authorities not cited in their briefs, they are ORDERED to notify the Court and opposing counsel of these authorities reasonably in advance of the hearing and to make copies available at the hearing. If the parties submit such additional authorities, they are ORDERED to submit the citations to the authorities only, with reference to pin cites and without argument or additional briefing. Cf. N.D. Civil Local Rule 7-3(d). The parties will be given the opportunity at oral argument to explain their reliance on such authority. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The Court notes that while Plaintiff's counsel requested that his costs of $1,000 be awarded, he failed to provide the Court with a detailed description of the costs incurred that amounted to $1,000. To the extent Plaintiff's counsel seeks to have his costs awarded, he shall provide such description by no later than November 19, 2008. The parties shall each have 15 minutes to address the following questions: (1) The parties have not provided the Court with a proposed order granting their requested incentive payment to Plaintiff or attorney's fees. Were they planning on doing so? If so, by when? (2) Have the parties received any objections since they submitted their declarations in support of their motion for joint approval? (3) Do the parties have anything further they wish to address? United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Dated: November 13, 2008 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?