Davis v. Barnhart et al

Filing 220

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMOVE DOCUMENTS (204 in 3:06-cv-06108-MHP) Declaration in Support filed by Michael J. Astrue, AND (118 in 3:09-cv-00980-MHP) Declaration in Support filed by Michael J. Astrue; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 3/30/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2011)

Davis v. Barnhart et al

Doc. 220

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

MELINDA HAAG (SBN 132612) United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division MICHAEL T. PYLE (SBN 172954) Assistant United States Attorney 150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Federal Defendant

8 9 10 11 12 TERRENCE DAVIS, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOHN DOE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of ) the Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 06-6108 MHP & No. C 09-980 MHP STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE DOCUMENT FROM DOCKETS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The parties stipulate to the following administrative request regarding a document currently in the public file in the Doe and Davis cases. The basis for the stipulation is as follows: On March 24, 2011, Plaintiffs' counsel notified Defendant's counsel of a concern that a few words in the Declaration of Wanda Adams in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No.118 in docket of the Doe case and No. 204 in the docket of the Davis case) could possibly lead to the identification of Mr. Doe, whose identity is confidential under a prior order of the Court. See Doe Docket No. 2. In order to remove any possible issue with the document, the parties have stipulated to request an order from the Court permanently removing Document No.118 in the docket of the Doe case and No. 204 in the docket of the Davis case. Defendant's counsel will then further redact the document in a form acceptable to Plaintiffs' counsel and file the further redacted declaration in the Doe and Davis cases. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: March 29, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney ___________/s/_________________ MICHAEL T. PYLE Assistant United States Attorney

_______/s/____________________ STEVEN F. BRUCE Attorney for Plaintiffs PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: Document No.118 in the docket of the Doe case and No. 204 in the docket of the Davis case shall be permanently removed from the docket in these cases. Defendant's counsel shall redact the document in a manner acceptable to Plaintiffs' counsel and re-file it. 3/30/2011 DATED:____________________

LI

arilyn H STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING REMOVAL OF DOCUMENT FROM DOCKET Judge M C 09-0980 MHP; C 06-6108 MHP 1

. Patel

FO

R NIA

___________________________________D HONORABLE MARILYN HALLRDERE O PATEL U.S. DISTRICT COURT S SO IT I JUDGE

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

NO

RT

H