Davis v. Barnhart et al

Filing 225

STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING LITIGATION pending further settlement conference; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 4/11/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2011)

1
2
3

MELINDA HAAG (SBN 132612)
United States Attorney
JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)
Chief, Civil Division
MICHAEL T. PYLE (SBN 172954)
Assistant United States Attorney

4
5
6

150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

7
Attorneys for Federal Defendant
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
TERRENCE DAVIS,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
the Social Security Administration,
Defendant.

17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOHN DOE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of )
the Social Security Administration,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )

No. C 06-6108 MHP & No. C 09-980 MHP
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING TEMPORARY
STAY OF LITIGATION DURING
SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS
Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel

1

The parties stipulate to the following matter, subject to the Court’s approval. On April 7,

2

2011 the parties held a settlement conference before the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte, and the

3

parties made sufficient progress toward a settlement of the Doe and Davis cases that they have

4

agreed to a schedule for a further exchange of certain information and to draft and meet and

5

confer about an agreement that would resolve these cases. The schedule is contained in Judge

6

Laporte’s civil minutes dated April 7, 2011. See Davis D.N. 223. The schedule agreed upon by

7

the parties would culminate, if necessary, in a further settlement conference with Judge Laporte

8

on May 24, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. The parties thus request that the Court stay the Doe and Davis

9

cases for all purposes until May 31, 2011, as this stay will allow the parties to focus their efforts

10

on a good faith effort to resolve these cases.

11

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

12

Dated: April 8, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

13
14

MELINDA HAAG

15

United States Attorney

16
___________/s/_________________
MICHAEL T. PYLE
Assistant United States Attorney

17
18
19

_______/s/____________________
STEVEN F. BRUCE
Attorney for Plaintiffs

20
21
22
23

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
The Doe and Davis cases are stayed for all purposes until May 31, 2011. The scope of the
stay includes all dates and events in these cases, including, but not limited to all discovery,

25

motion practice, court deadlines and hearing dates. The only matter outside the scope of the stay

26

is the settlement proceedings being conducted by Judge Laporte.

. Patel

NO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STAY OF LITIGATION DURING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS
arilyn H
Judge M
C 09-0980 MHP; C 06-6108 MHP
1

IA

IT

ORN

___________________________________
D
HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL
RDERE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
S SO O
I

RT

IF

4/11/2011
DATED:____________________

UNIT
ED

28

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

27

S

24

H