Davis v. Barnhart et al

Filing 82

STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing briefing schedules: amended complaint to be filed by 11/10/2008; Motions for class certification to be filed by 11/18/2008; responsive pleading to be filed by 1/12/2009; Responses due by 1/12/2009; Replies due by 1/20/2009; Motion Hearing set for 2/2/2009 02:00 PM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/3/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Steven Bruce, Esq. CBN 70300 People With Disabilities Foundation 507 Polk Street, Suite 430 San Francisco, CA 94102 Tel (415) 931-3070 Fax (415) 931-2828 sbruce@pwdf.org Attorney for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TERRENCE DAVIS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the ) ) Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant ) ) CIVIL ACTION No.: 3:06-CV-6108 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION FOR FURTHER SUSPENDING LITIGATION FOR DEFENDANT'S REVIEW OF PLAINTIFFS' OFFER OF SETTLEMENT The parties stipulate that the current dates to amend the Second Amended Complaint and file the Motion for Certification of Class Action (Doc. No. 77) be extended for an additional forty-five (45) days to November 10, 2008, and to November 18, 2008, respectively. Defendant will file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff's amended complaint and opposition to motion for certification no later than January 12, 2009. Plaintiff's reply brief in support of his motion for class certification will be filed no later than January 20, 2009. /// /// [PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION FOR FURTHER SUSPENDING LITIGATION FOR DEFENDANT'S REVIEW OF PLAINTIFFS' OFFER OF SETTLEMENT -106-CV-6108 MHP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The hearing date for the motion for class certification will be noticed for February 2, 2009. If there is a motion to dismiss the amended complaint filed, it will be noticed for February 2, 2009. This request is made because both Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby represent to this Court that they are proceeding in good faith on settlement proceedings, which was initiated by Plaintiffs on July 15, 2008, and responded to by Defendant on August 29, 2008. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Date: September 2, 2008 Steven Bruce, Attorney for Plaintiffs /s/ Date: September 2, 2008 Andrew Cheng, Attorney for Defendant /// /// /// [PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION FOR FURTHER SUSPENDING LITIGATION FOR DEFENDANT'S REVIEW OF PLAINTIFFS' OFFER OF SETTLEMENT -206-CV-6108 MHP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [Proposed] Order The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, hereby orders that: 1. The time for Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint be extended to November 10, 2008; 2. The time for Plaintiffs to file the Motion for Certification of Class Action be extended to November 18, 2008; 3. The time for Defendant to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' amended complaint will be no later than January 12, 2009; 4. The time for Defendant to file its Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of Class Action to be no later than January 12, 2009; 5. Plaintiff's reply brief in support of his motion for certification will be due on January 20, 2009; and 6. The hearing dates for the motion for class certification and for any motion to dismiss filed by defendant will be February 2, 2009. 18 19 20 UNIT ED S 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER N F D IS T IC T O R [PROPOSED] STIPULATION FOR SUSPENDING LITIGATION FOR DEFENDANT'S REVIEW OF PLAINTIFFS' OFFER OF SETTLEMENT -306-CV-6108 MHP A C LI FO 21 Marilyn Hall Patel U.S. District H. Patel Judge arilyn Judge M R NIA Date: 9/3/2008 O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?