Nova Wines, Inc. v. Adler Fels Winery LLC et al

Filing 144

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE; Each side to bear costs; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 12/1/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Surjit P. Soni (State Bar No. 127419) M. Danton Richardson (State Bar No. 141709) Leo E. Lundberg, Jr. (State Bar No. 125951) THE SONI LAW FIRM 35 North Lake Ave., Suite 720 Pasadena, California 91101 [phone] Telephone [phone] Fax email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants, ADLER FELS WINERY LLC, SAAL BROWN, INC. dba PACIFIC LICENSING, INC., GARY SAAL AND TOM KELLEY STUDIOS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION NOVA WINES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) ADLER FELS WINERY LLC, a Minnesota ) corporation; SAAL BROWN, INC, a California ) corporation DBA PACIFIC LICENSING, GARY ) SAAL an individual; TOM KELLEY STUDIOS, ) INC., a California corporation ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) ) ADLER FELS WINERY LLC, SAAL BROWN, ) INC., DBA PACIFIC LICENSING; GARY ) SAAL, TOM KELLEY STUDIOS, INC., ) ) Counter-Claimants ) ) v. ) ) NOVA WINES, INC., ROBERT HOLDER, ) DONNA HOLDER, CMG WORLDWIDE, INC., ) MARILYN MONROE LLC, AND DOES 1 - 10, ) ) Counter-Defendants ) _______________________________________ )
Case No. C 06-6149

CASE NO.:

C 06-6149 MHP

Complaint Filed: September 29, 2006 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS AND ENTIRE ACTION

Pre-Trial Conf: Time: Trial Date: Time:

TBD 9:00 a.m. TBD 9:00 a.m.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS AND ENTIRE ACTION

StiptoDismissClaims 112508.wpd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff, NOVA WINES, INC., and Counter-Defendants ROBERT and DONNA HOLDER, and Third Party Defendants, CMG WORLDWIDE, INC., and MARILYN MONROE LLC, on the one hand, and Defendants/Counter-Claimants, ADLER FELS WINERY LLC, SAAL BROWN, INC. dba PACIFIC LICENSING, INC., GARY SAAL AND TOM KELLEY STUDIOS, INC., on the other, having previously stipulated to dismiss certain claims, without prejudice, with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs, hereby stipulate to dismiss all remaining claims and this entire action, without prejudice, with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action through the date of dismissal, and with the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into among the parties to this action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Case No. C 06-6149

StiptoDismissClaims 112508.wpd

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS AND ENTIRE ACTION 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: November 25, 2008

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP By: /s/ Erick C. Howard ERICK C. HOWARD

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants, NOVA WINES, INC., ROBERT HOLDER and DONNA HOLDER

Dated: November 25, 2008

THE SONI LAW FIRM

By:

/s/ M. Danton Richardson M. DANTON RICHARDSON

Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants ADLER FELS WINERY LLC, SAAL BROWN, INC. dba PACIFIC LICENSING, INC., GARY SAAL AND TOM KELLEY STUDIOS, INC.

Dated: November 25, 2008

LOEB & LOEB LLP

By

/s/ Laura A. Wytsma LAURA A. WYTSMA

Attorneys for Third Party Defendant, MARILYN MONROE LLC Dated: November 25, 2008 SOVICH MINCH LLP

By

/s/ Theodore J. Minch THEODORE J. MINCH

Attorneys for Third Party Defendant, CMG WORLDWIDE, INC.

Case No. C 06-6149

StiptoDismissClaims 112508.wpd

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS AND ENTIRE ACTION 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C 06-6149

[PROPOSED] ORDER Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, all remaining claims and this entire action are hereby dismissed without prejudice with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action through the date of dismissal. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into among the parties to this action. IT IS SO ORDERED

12/1 Dated: ________________, 2008

UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTR

UNIT ED

_____________________________________

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS AND ENTIRE ACTION

StiptoDismissClaims 112508.wpd

A

C

LI

FO

arilyn Judge M

H. Pate

l

R NIA

D RDERE S SO O HALL PATEL HONT I I. MARILYN

S

ES AT T

ICT C

RT U O

NO

RT

H